Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp273812igc; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.122.101 with SMTP id lr5mr6817437pab.130.1394648850636; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ng20-ip9.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (ng20-ip9.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com. [98.139.165.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5si3112861pbh.224.2014.03.12.11.27.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:27:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: manual fallback record for domain of sentto-85080895-3762-1394648848-daveyxm=virginmedia.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com designates 98.139.165.185 as permitted sender) client-ip=98.139.165.185; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: manual fallback record for domain of sentto-85080895-3762-1394648848-daveyxm=virginmedia.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com designates 98.139.165.185 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sentto-85080895-3762-1394648848-daveyxm=virginmedia.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com; dkim=pass header.i=@yahoogroups.co.uk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.co.uk; s=oscaro; t=1394648848; bh=/GIO2DSL4qQDHoqZGHks1daAlYNhceRe2valRauQEZs=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:X-Provags-ID:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type; b=sh1pqWOQhz+3ZkXhJkbn6U3ljZoDL8JdruTMNjEeN7vnOnHFnWF3mwJPAeFhXLHN6eqQxgSQG4ATFuKoUWcxxExSAIXaRy6EFUrSebk9Bn+ubxVs+uA2IvjtjxPFBkq9SeCqRCWrcE2lGuWsNXsEYYfLxybKF8/wETWe9oq7bG0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=oscaro; d=yahoogroups.co.uk; b=bRdV7NYbYSWV/yjiaJOQ60vIGxvdDny6baIweyNW9jk9QvnCWodmerX4xRpTNwz4b88aSgWtLe98rf4VN4N7rLZHtV1wRoUnKSsbVfkUzY0XeZ7nwdLOOgc1xEILbcz+fAfMJHygvBNJFtugNjp/mYmbg7eTjQ7PEv6hzKA5eJA=; Received: from [66.196.81.182] by ng20.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2014 18:27:28 -0000 Received: from [10.193.39.27] by tg10.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Mar 2014 18:27:28 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 85080895-m3762 X-Sender: cpaul@gmx.net X-Apparently-To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Received: (qmail 40673 invoked by uid 102); 12 Mar 2014 18:27:27 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (HELO mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com) (10.193.84.33) by m10.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2014 18:27:27 -0000 X-Received: (qmail 12558 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2014 18:27:27 -0000 X-Received: from unknown (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.15.18) by mtaq2.grp.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2014 18:27:27 -0000 X-Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.138.143]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mfn88-1Wkz3y12t2-00N9vR; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:26 +0100 To: Cc: References: <5A89E1B93EBF49B791182A36A4A894E4@F6CNI> <532096C0.7040901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <532096C0.7040901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Message-ID: <98FEB6687E7643A7B7B48F1E1E52F842@Clemens0811> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac8+F0A9mx1ByYiaSfejs1J56v/S0AAAf47Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5cb9SAUTM9gimnBFkhH89p9UjYftqtb+WRisSgnr5tcg4enZIH3 zyL4P3L8C/jIAGH3FwM2zxcQL8UOmJkc9q59Bn9Jd39jSMI1SF4eAmVqDpP+rPayol5yAnZ mToKj3up1tqtWJFghBEvUKnylKbdrE8GndmtpjQ/MWFuc/BKeh8QtCNd5ZltvpzH5bvGgKz lWQ2ecOHYMVVQEVKd9/Zw== X-Originating-IP: 10.193.84.33 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 2:4:8:0:2 From: "Clemens Paul" X-Yahoo-Profile: dl4raj Sender: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk; contact rsgb_lf_group-owner@yahoogroups.co.uk Delivered-To: mailing list rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk List-Id: Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:27:27 +0100 Subject: [rsgb_lf_group] DK7FC's CW signal on MW Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-email-ff-m Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="TZAisP-rw9PXrcFbwmL65GLx3FJu537Ws-NonxM" --TZAisP-rw9PXrcFbwmL65GLx3FJu537Ws-NonxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Stefan, I do hope that your ugly cw signal will not jam nearly the whole 1kHz segment from 472kHz to 473kHz next weekend as last sunday evening. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DK7FC_chirpy.png https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DK7FC.png Your sideband noise/click spectrum destroyed my qso with DJ6CB when his signal went below S6 by qsb. It would be a good idea to clean up your CW signal a lot or if you're not capable do do this reduce your power by at least 10dB,then you would be probably closer to 1W ERP than now.. BTW on sunday evening I heard you mocking ERP regulations in a qso, so you seem not to care much about them. I'm not sure if this is helpful for our MW allocation and "you can't work them if you can't hear them". There are examples how a big AND clean signal can look like,e.g. from DK1IS (sorry no screenshot). Also DF5QG's signal is much cleaner than yours even if not optimum. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DF5QG.png You could also move to the upper end near 479kHz where you don't disturb the reception of other weak cw signals? You seem a bit to behave on MW like you where alone. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ --TZAisP-rw9PXrcFbwmL65GLx3FJu537Ws-NonxM Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit  

Hello Stefan,

I do hope that your ugly cw signal will not jam nearly the whole 1kHz segment
from 472kHz to 473kHz next weekend as last sunday evening.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DK7FC_chirpy.png
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DK7FC.png
Your sideband noise/click spectrum destroyed my qso with DJ6CB when his signal went below S6 by qsb.
It would be a good idea to clean up your CW signal a lot or if you're not capable do do this
reduce your power by at least 10dB,then you would be probably closer to 1W ERP than now..
BTW on sunday evening I heard you mocking ERP regulations in a qso, so you seem not
to care much about them.
I'm not sure if this is helpful for our MW allocation and
"you can't work them if you can't hear them".
There are examples how a big AND clean signal can look like,e.g. from DK1IS
(sorry no screenshot).
Also DF5QG's signal is much cleaner than yours even if not optimum.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/36274675/DF5QG.png
You could also move to the upper end near 479kHz where you don't disturb the reception of
other weak cw signals?
You seem a bit to behave on MW like you where alone.

73
Clemens
DL4RAJ


__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (1)
.

__,_._,___
--TZAisP-rw9PXrcFbwmL65GLx3FJu537Ws-NonxM--