Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp305268igc; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:10:03 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.7.196 with SMTP id l4mr3916350wja.92.1394129403244; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:10:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id xb3si1471315wjc.34.2014.03.06.10.10.02 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WLc76-0000PP-Bv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:29:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WLc75-0000PG-Qe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:29:43 +0000 Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WLc73-0004aa-Om for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:29:42 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id d17so1252409eek.29 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:29:41 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=pKL+/beS9nKKPOvyTVnbekH04KCM6mcv3+E9z8uLJbU=; b=luTdj/D5wtjgzv6sJbMxe+Fc//NhnL9fe9fLZK+mB8p4fSltT2UsRn8AsoLpCoNqeR YDsOQqipUXoNAswu9Itdyz6OpqlRJcTX8LfbjPZSNsVjeBR5dpdu5qu2G1uRGgGTiBv5 1cSzgcwbnyW1MZXxHYCP5VcWyDHpMGXtU4VHbZ+eueC3y31iJ9FNeum58A8IDY1g2wW2 L0NClwEY3oFz/FRKSCFa78dJ34UbTHL9JTNoKMAZLdQh+OI3DyzDWa1iSPWBHQ/y2WHs NPFNWXT80uM0yHQnJrdBCrdJZEfioz1obfK7a03t5hUYLGVfKK3tS4juoLQ2iTBGHDA9 aadw== X-Received: by 10.14.93.199 with SMTP id l47mr14025203eef.58.1394126980994; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:29:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([217.67.155.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f45sm24048067eeg.5.2014.03.06.09.29.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:29:40 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) From: John Rabson In-Reply-To: <53188931.8020805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:29:39 +0100 Message-Id: <7D8B20D1-78FC-40D6-B22D-3A55AF70B20B@gmail.com> References: <53179301.8080002@broadpark.no> <53187B41.3020201@gmx.net> <53188931.8020805@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 6 Mar 2014, at 15:41CET, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > … But somehow, there is that mode: CW. Take a look at http://www.dxsummit.fi/CustomFilter.aspx?customCount=50&customRange=472 and you will see that there is permanent CW activity, all around the year. Do you remember, it is more than 10 years ago that a CW exam was not part of the HF licence in Germany. And many of the class2 amateurs (VHF/UHF licences) gibed "Hahaha, now CW will die out soon". But somehow it does not, even without a new software update :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (john.rabson07[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (john.rabson07[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: e09cca6d8e44a91eadbdfb3e1b8aec09 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Subject: Re: LF: Activity etc. Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false On 6 Mar 2014, at 15:41CET, Stefan Sch=E4fer = wrote: > =85 But somehow, there is that mode: CW. Take a look at = http://www.dxsummit.fi/CustomFilter.aspx?customCount=3D50&customRange=3D47= 2 and you will see that there is permanent CW activity, all around the = year. Do you remember, it is more than 10 years ago that a CW exam was = not part of the HF licence in Germany. And many of the class2 amateurs = (VHF/UHF licences) gibed "Hahaha, now CW will die out soon". But somehow = it does not, even without a new software update :-) And in the UK, there was an upsurge in the use of CW, most particularly = on the 40 m band from stations with M3 calls. On the M3 training course, = students were introduced to Morse and did a paper and pencil exercise, = but were not required to pass a test. Because it was not obligatory, = knowledge of CW became attractive. When day-to-day matters become stressful, I find it very relaxing to = listen to hand-sent Morse, particularly in the QRP segment of 40 m =96 = and this after more than 50 years of using the mode. 73 John F5VLF