Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp14508igc; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 12:51:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.15.21.2 with SMTP id c2mr967374eeu.77.1394311894903; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 12:51:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v2si4109946eel.79.2014.03.08.12.51.34 for ; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 12:51:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WMOCL-0007jU-7h for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:50:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WMOCK-0007jL-J8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:50:20 +0000 Received: from omr-d08.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.207]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WMOCI-00070x-Jp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 20:50:19 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mae02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mae02.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.142]) by omr-d08.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 1E459700000B2 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 15:50:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-237-52-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.52]) by mtaout-mae02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 5455C38000085 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 15:50:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <6F39BC7EB5674C358E3C3AFFE8B7892D@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <2662DF5AA7FA416CBB09CDB90BBFF7B1@White> <016101cf39df$4f4c89a0$ede59ce0$@comcast.net> <01dc01cf3a3f$86997bb0$93cc7310$@comcast.net> <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White> <531B1D0C.3070208@abelian.org> <531B2478.70500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <531B796A.9000906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 21:49:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1394311816; bh=HpSGOKTDBEr1nokxDvJ/qQIxPGT3/PWMjjXSGCJ2n8o=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BzBVsvCx+c1nHtZd8QaxhJSciJS0rDmNkn9u1pdC4+p8/+IjJq+evBfN/Hb8MVVDz A5mz9sMfvtvCj5OuZvYOwz5bV4QWOJ4cE3gC70Z/ynjvnTYlOyVEfCQzZq9pTrBo1l sJs5uBAA6OgYymA66qb/be1TWA1nkuqcfaM/D8ss= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afe8e531b82857dd0 X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.52 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, that one looks like an analog video system, 2.4 GHz FM, with a dedicated receiver box. I once owned a similar set and attempted to transfer 137 kHz directly through the video channel, without a mixer. But with the strong in-band utility stations, the dynamic range seemed too poor. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.109.207 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 21e2055b299bd63ed331c37c8a3e15ca Subject: Re: LF: Microphone via WLAN (WiFi) ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01CF3B18.449A23C0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CF3B18.449A23C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, that one looks like an analog video system, 2.4 GHz FM, with a dedicated = receiver box. I once owned a similar set and attempted to transfer 137 = kHz directly through the video channel, without a mixer. But with the = strong in-band utility stations, the dynamic range seemed too poor. On the other hand I'm not sure whether WLAN / WiFi standard would be the = best choice either when looking for low battery drain. 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 9:11 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Microphone via WLAN (WiFi) ? ... But now i found this:=20 http://www.amazon.de/Kamera-%C3%9Cberwachungskamera-Empf%C3%A4nger-Zubeh%= C3%B6r-Wireless/dp/B004AZL6AE/ref=3Dpd_cp_ce_2 ... ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CF3B18.449A23C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan,
 
that one looks like an analog = video system,=20 2.4 GHz FM, with a dedicated receiver box. I once owned a similar set = and=20 attempted to transfer 137 kHz directly through the video channel, = without a=20 mixer. But with the strong in-band utility stations, the = dynamic range=20 seemed too poor.
 
On the other hand I'm not sure whether = WLAN / WiFi=20 standard would be the best choice either when looking for low battery=20 drain.
 
73,
Markus (DF6NM)

From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2014 9:11 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: Microphone via WLAN (WiFi) = ?

...
But now i found this:
http://www.amazon= .de/Kamera-%C3%9Cberwachungskamera-Empf%C3%A4nger-Zubeh%C3%B6r-Wireless/d= p/B004AZL6AE/ref=3Dpd_cp_ce_2

...
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CF3B18.449A23C0--