Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp173771igc; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 17:21:39 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.71.47 with SMTP id r15mr3872330wju.19.1393982498855; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:21:38 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c4si939298wjb.13.2014.03.04.17.21.38 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 17:21:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@btinternet.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WL0A8-0000LB-Un for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:58:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WL0A8-0000L2-EG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:58:20 +0000 Received: from smtpout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.123]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WL0A6-0003OW-Fm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:58:19 +0000 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090202.531676A8.0059,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=12/97,refid=2.7.2:2014.2.27.92415:17:12.455,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __PHISH_FROM2, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODY_SIZE_1500_1599, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __PHISH_FROM, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from gnat (86.146.137.200) by smtpout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.99.10223) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 52F0346C01AA2E2E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 00:58:15 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1393981098; bh=vw9767AaMHO/ANbW7ddY2spIn2WKJv2SaJ/di27teMo=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer; b=X3OZemCrmIlGD61mc9IGcJ2yYftSlBDeZcLVkfmV2vojU5zk9LRwpmEUy1FGYqvqIuVbEwz2QQDhH66j+64iBMsbVnjFYGS8KS6LsKs4lVTgdjui9xwhCsbaMgl4o0NAhdkOF2jNRk7hudaYBOnWs/xpOPiavDla6x+8Ao3A4dA= Message-ID: <671098891B594C27902F5358B04E0916@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <52FE05BD.6020207@broadpark.no> <52FE0631.8010907@broadpark.no> <52FE308E.9080509@freenet.de> <52FE7EA8.3070607@broadpark.no> <53162A45.2090507@broadpark.no> <53162BCA.7050809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 00:57:48 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: How about a simple reason........more modes than active operators? but hey "variety is the spice of life" Alan G3NYK (one of the inactive "operators") :-)) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:37 AM Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.20.0.123 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false How about a simple reason........more modes than active operators? but hey "variety is the spice of life" Alan G3NYK (one of the inactive "operators") :-)) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 12:37 AM Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? > Anything that is published about LF/ MF has cq, qrss and beacons as > the main thread > > Anyone that tunes into LF/MF finds cw,qrss, beacons > > Anyone that try's to change direction , is met with a facsimile of a > gyroscope in precession > > Its exciting , wobbles for a while , defies expectations then once > the input is removed > it regains its initial orientation , > > And the more the technical input , ie the faster the rotation , the > more the resistance to > change ... > > G,) > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 7:38 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? > >> Hi Steinar, >> >> If no big gun is needed and there is no activity anyway, then there must >> be another reason. Do you have an idea? >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >>> Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have >>> a big gun. >>> >>> LA5VNA S >>> >>> >>> >> >