Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp115704igc; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:21:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.98.199 with SMTP id ek7mr8264129wib.21.1394464904477; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id fz20si4117330wjc.116.2014.03.10.08.21.43 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:21:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@kabelmail.de Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WN1PT-00019Z-51 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:42:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WN1PS-00019Q-KI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:42:30 +0000 Received: from smtp-out04.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.113]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WN1PP-0006bR-Oz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:42:29 +0000 Received: from IMAP2 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtp-out04.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s2AEgQui013426 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:42:26 +0100 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=kabelmail.de Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kabelmail.de; s=mail; t=1394462546; bh=3/3+L3cHDzBIqy/jv09yygvQTw7t+gvfkRdH7nAFQ6A=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=ot9j9XjnWvR6yQYnyM7uH+ofVPrnVVZSxSJdcHcpIATZQdthMIWUlUdz+MAyJXapL qXfmnO0pwVNr7mNqsM4vpsyuIQMIcqHDXtjyVsl8mL7iO1EhA3FrJsfH/oIEmWExeG E5Fn4V5U7IAer0XKCiFTbBZjUfOXwrESOAfWLDV0= Received: from KlausPC (91-67-180-52-dynip.superkabel.de [91.67.180.52] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id s2AEgORn029738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:42:24 +0100 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [91.67.180.52] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [k.hirschelmann@kabelmail.de] Message-ID: <63EEF6E2876843829EAEF135CAAE9905@KlausPC> From: "Klaus Hirschelmann" To: References: <048001cf3c01$e513fd00$af3bf700$@comcast.net> <531DC2A6.4080606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <531DC2A6.4080606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:42:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140310-0, 10.03.2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-mediaBEAM-AuthCheck: route113 X-mediaBEAM-AuthScore: 5.3/5.0, scanned in 1.041sec X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, interesting project. Product also is available via www.reichelt.de Their price isn't lowest, but a least they are providing a little bit more on technical informations: http://www.reichelt.de/index.html?&ACTION=7&LA=3&OPEN=0&INDEX=0&FILENAME=F100%252FDB_B_SPEECH_RTX1.pdf [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.41.113 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: LF: Re: Bluetooth instead? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Stefan, interesting project. Product also is available via www.reichelt.de Their price isn't lowest, but a least they are providing a little bit more on technical informations: http://www.reichelt.de/index.html?&ACTION=7&LA=3&OPEN=0&INDEX=0&FILENAME=F100%252FDB_B_SPEECH_RTX1.pdf Interesting detail ist: Range ( Receiver ) : 10m Range ( transmitter ) : 100m Another solution could be Bluettoth modules from www.kcwirefee.com E.g. there is type "KC-5012" with up to 18dbm output power An article with using a very similar, but low power version of this chip can be found in QST August 2013 Page 30-33 73 de Klaus, DJ7OO --- Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus Schutz ist aktiv. http://www.avast.com