Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp63836igc; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 13:06:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.181.13.82 with SMTP id ew18mr5460300wid.22.1394395607104; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k10si16993312wjb.29.2014.03.09.13.06.46 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 13:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WMjdw-0006EJ-IL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 19:44:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WMjdw-0006EA-67 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 19:44:16 +0000 Received: from parrot.netcom.co.uk ([217.72.171.49]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WMjdt-0002a9-N4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2014 19:44:15 +0000 Received: from sb.abelian.org (i-194-106-52-83.freedom2surf.net [194.106.52.83]) by parrot.netcom.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4985832740D for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 19:42:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sb.abelian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AFB28A0B55 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2014 19:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <531CC48C.9090408@abelian.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 19:44:12 +0000 From: Paul Nicholson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <016101cf39df$4f4c89a0$ede59ce0$@comcast.net>, <01dc01cf3a3f$86997bb0$93cc7310$@comcast.net>, <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White>,<531B1D0C.3070208@abelian.org> ,<531B4E01.7000304@abelian.org> <039f01cf3b72$bfa1db80$3ee59280$@comcast.net> <76F90E9771CA44F3981F679241E1A005@White> <03ca01cf3b92$eea24670$cbe6d350$@comcast.net> <531C64DA.5050102@abelian.org> <03e101cf3b98$3a61cef0$af256cd0$@comcast.n et> In-Reply-To: <03e101cf3b98$3a61cef0$af256cd0$@comcast.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jim wrote: > was the quick phase change of 120 degrees > corrected prior to integration? I'm plotting the signal in 20 minute integrations so there isn't much loss due to the phase change. [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.72.171.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral) X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Jim wrote: > was the quick phase change of 120 degrees > corrected prior to integration? I'm plotting the signal in 20 minute integrations so there isn't much loss due to the phase change. We had about 120 deg phase change on the night of 6th/7th but it took 6 hours, not 2. Here I plot three nights of opera alongside NAA for comparison of amplitudes http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140309b.gif -- Paul Nicholson --