Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp157455igc; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:49:18 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.2.110 with SMTP id 14mr16786wjt.96.1393966157291; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:49:17 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kl5si59907wjc.148.2014.03.04.12.49.16 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 12:49:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKwAG-0007mD-Ac for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:42:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKwAF-0007m4-TN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:42:11 +0000 Received: from erato-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKwAD-0002iK-US for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 20:42:10 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from aqua-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.10.60]) by erato-smout.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTP id <0N1X00HF6ITG3H90@erato-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:41:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.27] ([84.48.126.215]) by aqua-smin.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0N1X007BNITG2S20@aqua-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:41:40 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <53163A84.3090007@broadpark.no> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:41:40 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52FE05BD.6020207@broadpark.no> <52FE0631.8010907@broadpark.no> <52FE308E.9080509@freenet.de> <52FE7EA8.3070607@broadpark.no> <53162A45.2090507@broadpark.no> <53163540.9050802@freenet.de> In-reply-to: <53163540.9050802@freenet.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Wolf , Got an error when trying to respondent to your private address. It was not my intent to stress you. You are doing a great job. LA5VNA S On 04.03.2014 21:19, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > Hi Steinar, > > Patience please .. I am still busy working with the code. > But that should not prevent anyone from using either Con's original > implementation, or my adaption of it. It has been updated a couple of > times already, but I didn't advertise each new version. > The next one, which is currently 'under test', will have a selector for > the in- and output device (soundcard), noise blanker, and a few other > additions. > > I also would like to see more two-way activity there myself. > > 73, > Wolf . > > Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have >> a big gun. >> >> LA5VNA S >> >> >> >> > > > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: Re: LF: WSQ2 dead already ? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Wolf , Got an error when trying to respondent to your private address. It was not my intent to stress you. You are doing a great job. LA5VNA S On 04.03.2014 21:19, wolf_dl4yhf wrote: > Hi Steinar, > > Patience please .. I am still busy working with the code. > But that should not prevent anyone from using either Con's original > implementation, or my adaption of it. It has been updated a couple of > times already, but I didn't advertise each new version. > The next one, which is currently 'under test', will have a selector for > the in- and output device (soundcard), noise blanker, and a few other > additions. > > I also would like to see more two-way activity there myself. > > 73, > Wolf . > > Am 04.03.2014 20:32, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Pity if that is the case. It was such a nice mode for us who do not have >> a big gun. >> >> LA5VNA S >> >> >> >> > > >