Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp5662igc; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:31:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.225.70 with SMTP id ri6mr20411299lac.26.1393788691367; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:31:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v4si9917524laj.133.2014.03.02.11.31.30 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:31:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKC5n-0001pW-7d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:30:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKC5m-0001pM-R3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:30:30 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKC5l-0008HT-0D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:30:29 +0000 Received: from crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.248]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s22JURJI022593 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:30:27 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D37E0F32 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:30:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <531386D2.6090602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:30:26 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: , ,<5313677A.2020400@abelian.org> <91EDCA349BE942929730C480D5D64F7F@White>,<5313813D.4000702@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: RR, CFM. Am 02.03.2014 20:25, schrieb Bob Raide: > Paul; > Jay and Stefan and you suggested I should transmit carrier for 1 hour > on 29.49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for hour and back again a > few times and then will start QRSS180. Does that make sense? Bob [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030604030603000109090003" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030604030603000109090003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit RR, CFM. Am 02.03.2014 20:25, schrieb Bob Raide: > Paul; > Jay and Stefan and you suggested I should transmit carrier for 1 hour > on 29.49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for hour and back again a > few times and then will start QRSS180. Does that make sense? Bob --------------030604030603000109090003 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit RR, CFM.

Am 02.03.2014 20:25, schrieb Bob Raide:
Paul;
Jay and Stefan and you suggested I should transmit carrier for 1 hour on 29.49900 then move up 10 MHz [29.49901] for hour and back again a few times and then will start QRSS180.  Does that make sense? Bob
--------------030604030603000109090003--