Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp5426igc; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:24:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.87.71 with SMTP id v7mr20437879laz.10.1393788241116; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:24:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e1si18107842lae.130.2014.03.02.11.24.00 for ; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 11:24:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKByc-0001Xr-1d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:23:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKByb-0001Xi-LG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:23:05 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKByZ-0008Bw-Si for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:23:04 +0000 Received: from crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.248]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s22JN2oN007079 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:23:02 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEFFE0F2C for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2014 20:23:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53138516.4030209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 20:23:02 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: , ,<5313677A.2020400@abelian.org> <91EDCA349BE942929730C480D5D64F7F@White> <5313813D.4000702@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <5313813D.4000702@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Bob, Paul, Am 02.03.2014 20:06, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > [...]After last night's test maybe a few more receivers > will be listening on 29499 Hz. Unfortunetely my soundcard of the VLF PC cannot sample faster than 48 kS/s so i have to build up a separate RX. Also the frequency response of the current active antenna is not ideal for that frequency. It cuts off at arround 15 kHz. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Subject: Re: LF: Would slower QRSS help? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Bob, Paul, Am 02.03.2014 20:06, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > [...]After last night's test maybe a few more receivers > will be listening on 29499 Hz. Unfortunetely my soundcard of the VLF PC cannot sample faster than 48 kS/s so i have to build up a separate RX. Also the frequency response of the current active antenna is not ideal for that frequency. It cuts off at arround 15 kHz. Bob, good luck in QRSS-180. I think it is the right choice, at least for Paul's RX. But i bet that Hartmut will pick up at least some traces too! 73, Stefan/DK7FC