Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp141673igc; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:06:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.6.8 with SMTP id w8mr34662704wjw.16.1394496403772; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ca6si343353wib.73.2014.03.10.17.06.43 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WN9lt-0002jq-7b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:38:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WN9ls-0002jh-Fk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:38:12 +0000 Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WN9lq-0008JP-49 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:38:11 +0000 Received: from omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.88]) by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bwP91n0041u4NiLA3ze7vx; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:38:07 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.180.58]) by omta21.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id bzdl1n00T1FzmAm8hzdrQi; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:38:02 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK From: "hvanesce" To: References: <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> <850A470A5B9F4483BED8B49D4791044A@White>,<531B1D0C.3070208@abelian.org> ,<531B4E01.7000304@abelian.org> <039f01cf3b72$bfa1db80$3ee59280$@comcast.net> <76F90E9771CA44F3981F679241E1A005@White> <03ca01cf3b92$eea24670$cbe6d350$@comcast.net> <531C64DA.5050102@abelian.org> <03e101cf3b98$3a61cef0$af256cd0$@comcast.n et> <531CC48C.9090408@abelian.org> <047901cf3bee$0fc64120$2f52c360$@comcast.net> <049201cf3c39$500d3900$f027ab00$@comcast.net> <531E37AF.9030802@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <531E37AF.9030802@abelian.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 16:37:39 -0700 Message-ID: <051601cf3cb9$c359c3d0$4a0d4b70$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQFwHFQtNP1cuGk4XhlGVCAC9znl2gL/ltlMAZQBOJ4BTNw9IwFm2JRrANpbPHcCgDHCSwHBWlJzAjva6xwCKaiURwE7H0f0AW84J6ICQ2gTNgJoajaZArP1Qf0BGkJfIAJ4DeJCAgmYGAcCEpdmWgHchd7iAR/3H/gBOUOoVgIieF0oAPejK3YBoGS4/5o9l/gw Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1394494687; bh=+chXR5Z10eieEtgQN4rrk3rU+V9HA57YW2gkrL5pIoo=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=f9JGwwLwdy+QaVEt2ICaaIQV9ViA7gE//aGWw7aglRWBFa0JkchUcqAMsNHdXqmdk Ha3lyDBqPSYKbcwIRu2A4F5ga6a5zdW8tVdc/0f2DHP7gcmLAd8yBpMiAn+DVqk6KL HAVp/TEdA1pffcz0tzcH2ZGw23ndlfmOsqtKviB7JDyslW2uIzyELOKffL05xVpTdg 29VE/A8o6jDJT4DCbCL0osdetDPOOD+oL/BjZP/vPMuDUqsN0Tv/KRIR/L8IIIDcku 5FHp07lVxBK7X46K4YjGPQHQ0omp7cu/1hpzMArtbkxnyzLoLac6uM67tvNn+1WBHF inHJS/niqNZDw== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, Thank you for the data and analysis. The WH2XBA/1 and WH2XBA/1 - NAA phase and amplitude plots are fascinating. Thanks to you and Bob for providing this valuable information (and great SNR!). The reference point on number of hops to consider for reasonable diurnal prediction is also much appreciated. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul, Thank you for the data and analysis. The WH2XBA/1 and WH2XBA/1 - NAA phase and amplitude plots are fascinating. Thanks to you and Bob for providing this valuable information (and great SNR!). The reference point on number of hops to consider for reasonable diurnal prediction is also much appreciated. Regarding day-to-day variations seen over the last week or so in phase and amplitude of signals received from WH2XBA/1: if these were to be seen over a longer period, would, in your experience, these be uncharacteristic of day-to-day variations seen in phase and amplitude of signals received from NAA, NWC, NPM and similar beacons at long range? Maybe the question is premature, in that the variations seen to date could be episodic. If they turn out to be recurrent, and if they are atypical of stability of signals from beacons like NAA, NWC and NPM at long range, I might be curious about the effects of polarization (and/or pattern) of electrically-short VLF radiators. Alternatively, if signals from beacons like NAA, NWC and NPM at long range often exhibit substantial day-to-day variations in diurnal amplitude and phase (>10dB, >100 degrees, >4 hours offset), I'd be interested in RX antenna polarization. Interactions in the waveguide are sensitive to inbound polarization, and cause additional changes in polarization, to which RX phase and amplitude are sensitive to different degrees, depending on how polarization is post-processed. I don't know, however, if these types of polarization effects ever culminate in 100-degree variations, for the types of equipment we've discussed. Sorry to bring this up before any issues are identified; I just thought I'd mention it while it was on my mind, and in case it's of interest later. 73, Jim -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 3:08 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz A better signal last night from WH2XBA/1 and I was able to go back to using 10 minute averages to improve time resolution http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140310a.gif 120 deg phase change as usual but taking till 04:00 to complete. S/N here was good between 04:00 and 08:00 thanks to background subsiding. Now four days comparison with NAA http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140310b.gif The first 3 nights were opera but last night was carrier until 04:00 and carrier would be sqrt(2) times stronger than opera. Yes it is possible for winter day maximum to exceed that of summer on certain paths. There is no simple rule to say which path. For example DHO at 23.4kHz to Todmorden (646 km) http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/dho_2013a.png http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/dho_2012a.png Propagation is complicated at short range because there are many modes (or combinations of rays with different number of hops if you visualise things that way) contributing to the total signal. When calculating signals by ray tracing it is usually necessary to include paths with up to 12 or 15 hops at least, in order to get a model that resembles a real diurnal. -- Paul Nicholson --