Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp104664igc; Sat, 8 Mar 2014 04:36:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.72.195 with SMTP id f3mr1381284wiv.61.1394282213877; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 04:36:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lx7si13243160wjb.39.2014.03.08.04.36.53 for ; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 04:36:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WMFn6-0003G9-M7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WMFn6-0003G0-48 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:44 +0000 Received: from qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WMFn3-0004lh-Ql for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:43 +0000 Received: from omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by qmta13.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id azqU1n0010lTkoCADzrftY; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:39 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.142]) by omta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id azrJ1n00434kqxi8QzrQou; Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:51:34 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK From: "hvanesce" To: References: <2662DF5AA7FA416CBB09CDB90BBFF7B1@White> <016101cf39df$4f4c89a0$ede59ce0$@comcast.net>, <01dc01cf3a3f$86997bb0$93cc7310$@comcast.net>, <2FC5CAB271A6437CB35A5B100185CEDA@White> <025101cf3a52$e0925750$a1b705f0$@comcast.net> <7DB9DD5669FC4C648838510DCAC08AFB@White> <531A506E.9040103@abelian.org> <531A5C19.9060209@abelian.org> <02ba01cf3aa3$debaad50$9c3007f0$@comcast.net> <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <531AF126.2060600@abelian.org> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 04:51:15 -0700 Message-ID: <02cd01cf3ac4$bfbcdba0$3f3692e0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQFwHFQtNP1cuGk4XhlGVCAC9znl2gG7rsFSAR0lnQgBd+LZewJLh/X8Ab8nTT4C/5bZTAGUATieAUzcPSMBZtiUawDaWzx3AoAxwksBwVpScwI72uscAimolEeazCP9oA== Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1394279499; bh=XSe/+3OXmyY+wsprqrVkL3tO2xxJXpodqZOaGEUCcE0=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=jHgMkn1vCWkt6LrPBuiwjFOMqO0wSSeoFQT70nb7zGU9ZyHs9Rk8Y0Ge4ezQw4a7b ZT5AKarQWXR+r6wpwq+V6ZfGd4qX0TfUFfMohtbZsR4iAFX3Vk7jydsZv5cnIjQmSP 5uSm4VnxRA3kI3VRGiytAssv0dMb5MzuViTkYNdT5cOyFwooHVlr6hJ/N1J6zpHMuP RiNPa9N9H1pAxy8CUyNPTDGNAkotyjR2UK+gEixf76oqS3DEGTBy3ci1iTUv9XYYou AqhrLoCuf0KZSuKJ9v9TNZv42Hzjc/y5J+qkuNeljf3AdomW7L7DuqPBMGP4LhAN2X HUOdRa9DWI3sA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, Thanks; as always, great data and analysis. After reviewing the six (including 1 previous) plots, I scrolled back and forth through them; in sequence they make a compelling picture. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.27.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b1e5ebccbad86c8ca1fd46d24f0285de Subject: RE: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul, Thanks; as always, great data and analysis. After reviewing the six (including 1 previous) plots, I scrolled back and forth through them; in sequence they make a compelling picture. The prognosis for 29 kHz activity is quite interesting; I'm looking forward to bringing equipment online. At the moment I am surrounded by 29 kHz TX and RX equipment that almost works. 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:30 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Daytime 29.499 kHz Yes Jim the 'z' scale is proportional to amplitude (flux density), not power. I completely agree with your interpretation of the plot - - The nighttime window doesn't quite close and even in high summer we still have couple of useful hours. - In compensation for the short night, the daytime propagation improves: better and longer, and by July, midday levels are about 6dB below the March nighttime. We should consider 'midday' to be relative to the center of the path. For comparison, NAA for two more years http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/naa_2012a.png http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/naa_2011a.png Looks pretty repeatable year to year. As Alan mentioned, the midday 'dome' is a feature of most long range diurnals. For example, NAU (Aguada) at 40.8 kHz for 2012 and 2013 http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/nau_2012a.png http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/nau_2013a.png Path length to NAU is 6740km, NAA is 4672km. Going eastwards, TBB (Bafa, Turkey) on 26.7 kHz range 2883km http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/tbb_2013a.png shows that it's not just an east-to-west feature. During flares, the signal is always enhanced which confirms that the dome improves with ionisation. The midday dome is essentially D-layer propagation. D-layer is formed by solar radiation (mostly nitric oxide ionised by Lyman alpha) with a reflection height of around 70km. At night this layer dissipates and reflection occurs from the E-layer at 95 km or thereabouts. Away from midday we have a mixture of the two, with E-layer reflections being attenuated by passage through a partially formed D-layer. The D layer is a good reflector when fully formed but being lower, more hops are required to cover a path. -- Paul Nicholson --