Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp68768igc; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 11:07:10 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.112.173.6 with SMTP id bg6mr22884167lbc.17.1393873630035; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 11:07:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jn5si15920972lbc.141.2014.03.03.11.07.09 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 11:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WKYBS-00029b-VL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:05:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WKYBS-00029S-Cr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:05:50 +0000 Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WKYBQ-0004kV-5j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:05:49 +0000 Received: from omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Z4Sh1n0040S2fkCA175lpN; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:05:45 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.142]) by omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Z75Q1n00e34kqxi8V75WB2; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:05:40 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=comcast.net Result=Signature OK From: "hvanesce" To: References: ,<53147DD2.8020201@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5314C73C.8040507@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <5314C73C.8040507@abelian.org> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 12:05:17 -0700 Message-ID: <010101cf3713$8da87ed0$a8f97c70$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJXhveCn450K/MK+QxEnIAMCfRqsgGnj3d8AkqdXXsCT/ovlpmM/vAw Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1393873546; bh=k80O0+k3w9eN6sudqCOg13IvxgBSmJxQF+72hDJBnw0=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=WUBbJWpizm+EbtmFux9zoD2AgajrpnjsyWazKURRJ28VWjxa/ziJFVcuFqHt5EhMj CCG15Ht104Uz6Yv4As3uljOCLfNbUL34GvYLxGqrGOQw+VvqrcXvQXuP7GMfWsVP/c GnFc2mUxbt+bZoqr5bYwoYBbXGSxUt7lgyzDONxWXP6fIycH4XwXB9mHJgpZrKQpmL /qBl5d2o/IaQGF52debMZKJp3Z7YwiQTSmKwiK+DdaaJP/HmYNwfSc7ORd+VN97ApQ 9e3DbxUJ/4lkze1VwxzNTiq2PeqXH6o1hF7pYECRWs+Ggcl9I8L4wt5RlJ/3fD32Xl 31bNxKQMZ9rQA== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, Thank you for the excellent data and processing, and the inspiring results! Bob, thank you for your TX work and excellent signal! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 4c0633a540d76adc241b9d3cede72a57 Subject: RE: LF: 29.499 QRSS 180 for remainer of night... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul, Thank you for the excellent data and processing, and the inspiring results! Bob, thank you for your TX work and excellent signal! I should leave well enough alone but: The nominal (which never happens) night-to-day increase in attenuation over this path may be around 14dB in early March. By midsummer, night-to-day increase in attenuation might nominally be 35dB. Paul's optimized spectrograms (below) show (~13dB?) SNR. If the nominal numbers are somewhere close to reality, this could be a window of opportunity for demonstration of 24-hour TA capture. Since the daytime window for this path is gradually closing (0.2dB per day if processes were linear, which they're not), I thought I'd mention it. Easy for me, I don't need to hold the corona-spray can round the clock. 73, Jim AA5BW -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Paul Nicholson Sent: Monday, March 3, 2014 11:18 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 29.499 QRSS 180 for remainer of night... I made a spectrogram of the Morse transmission using a transform width equal to the 180 second dot length, advancing the transform by 60 seconds each time http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140303_180_60_rect.png As expected, the signal is now 'in the yellow'. Markus advised me that using a shorter transform aids readability even though it discards some S/N. Here it is with 90 second transform advancing by 45 seconds, http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/29499_140303_90_45_rect.png and sure enough it is now quite easy to read the Morse letters. There is one 'B' where the dash is broken into two dots by a noise spike. I tried Hann and some other windows but rectangular seemed to do best. The 10mHz shift was very effective and ought to ID the signal even if the trace was very faint on a spectrogram. Fingers crossed for some reports from further into Europe. The signal was showing no sign of fading out by 08:00 UT so I guess it would still come through for another hour or maybe two. -- Paul Nicholson --