Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp371165igc; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:12:02 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.152.10.70 with SMTP id g6mr979496lab.65.1392138721603; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:12:01 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si10408861lah.38.2014.02.11.09.12.00 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:12:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WDGPx-0000XT-Az for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:42:41 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WDGPw-0000XG-HU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:42:40 +0000 Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WDGPs-0004HE-Ua for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:42:39 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k4so12140067qaq.15 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:42:34 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0+h/CCUUpw80ufX++EqFp3BZ8IHR7fZbuj6+0LlmumU=; b=c9LmnxTDMEHLfuqDxZ8ALGYaa5hk/io2gSjOyflWgWPo0cMQZeY9/AbZtNrWtQbUMH zsUgi1SpMebRHGdhfxkbXxfhcj4TxBfLByEp1DOk1gAyv3+i6Zm33PxjSTDp/4f5K/nX PsAQS2Az6RudHJp8YZ1PJuKiPIiKPS05UOrMGhvRWa6PB6G6Ar0aU4nmFutdVHlVU4uf +p7DO6n+vjVA8sETA0/D8BlYQUBUQSrYNVN+k9qZn+v0pjNVErscYXcExJG5O6yvFibj NnWRNSfFyLJEe7jMrTjXvrMWFn/0aVfxbrNDe0NXjPtgVkHi+eg3cmmpcRgdOYcQhj0h Cx2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.105.35 with SMTP id b32mr56142175qgf.36.1392136954236; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:42:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.241.197 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:42:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52FA3D02.9000304@gmail.com> References: <770BF282-A608-4681-B003-EF0C9C8FB510@gmail.com> <52FA3D02.9000304@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:42:34 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: All points noted. WRT below 8.3kHz I'd like a clear unambiguous answer saying, as long as no interference to legitimate services caused, it is OK to use the frequencies freely. At 73kHz, likewise, it would be good to be told, that with some limits it is OK to experiment. If one wants to publicise/share results it is better to know it is OK to go ahead. Up to now ALL my VLF and LF work has beenm with very low ERPs. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.216.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 77d68ebd44814a6def4d7158b7296e78 Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: Questions about 73kHz and sub 8.3kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113940caa2de0e04f2242405 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a113940caa2de0e04f2242405 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 All points noted. WRT below 8.3kHz I'd like a clear unambiguous answer saying, as long as no interference to legitimate services caused, it is OK to use the frequencies freely. At 73kHz, likewise, it would be good to be told, that with some limits it is OK to experiment. If one wants to publicise/share results it is better to know it is OK to go ahead. Up to now ALL my VLF and LF work has beenm with very low ERPs. 73s Roger G3XBM On 11 February 2014 15:08, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX wrote: > Warren Ziegler wrote: > >> John, >> >> Good background information. A few years ago someone on the U.S. >> longwave reflector decided that it was a good idea to pepper the FCC with >> very pointed and specific questions. >> > Warren, > > Was that the fellow who was building a monster coil for 1750M in his > driveway? > > Dex > > -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm --001a113940caa2de0e04f2242405 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All points noted.

WRT below 8.3kHz I'= ;d like a clear unambiguous answer saying, as long as no interference to le= gitimate services caused, it is OK to use the frequencies freely. At 73kHz,= likewise, it would be good to be told, that with some limits it is OK to e= xperiment.=A0 If one wants to publicise/share results it is better to know = it is OK to=A0 go ahead. Up to now ALL my VLF and LF work has beenm with ve= ry low ERPs.

73s
Roger G3XBM

=
On 11 February 2014 15:08, Dexter McIntyre W= 4DEX <dexter.mc@gmail.com> wrote:
Warren Ziegler wrote:
John,

=A0 =A0Good background information. =A0A few years ago someone on the U.S. = longwave reflector decided that it was a good idea to pepper the FCC with v= ery pointed and specific questions.
Warren,

Was that the fellow who was building a monster coil for 1750M in his drivew= ay?

Dex




--
--001a113940caa2de0e04f2242405--