Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp225123igc; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.84.144 with SMTP id z16mr18314199wjy.23.1391955767005; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 06:22:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dc3si5011253wib.49.2014.02.09.06.22.46 for ; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 06:22:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WCUmw-0006PO-GG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:51:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WCUmw-0006PF-0e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:51:14 +0000 Received: from omr-m08.mx.aol.com ([64.12.222.129]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WCUmu-0003WB-18 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 13:51:12 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mae02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mae02.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.142]) by omr-m08.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 56CB2700000AE for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 08:51:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-237-152-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.152]) by mtaout-mae02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 83CE838000095 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2014 08:51:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: From: "Markus Vester" To: References: , <0AE8FCE0012A455E8854CB39126AA62B@White> <00b401cf250e$a4fc9420$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <52F69E6F.6060300@gmail.com> <984B5BFDBD1644A6B4BC5F22996E9088@White> <9C2AD13E5CFD44ABABF8FF80021DED3F@White> <52F7802C.7030305@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 14:50:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1391953869; bh=vRHDygNCzo8JV5P2ZcxaN3a1vyI5dc1PUJil88PsL4Q=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Dc9nYtu4ay7x2qmuIaaf9afaFs4XaQcj/h4m/7ZfxhiiOhwIy1k8WIUIYJ0YP026S irHkB9ZqLL54Bx9JzudsQ96U1ri1WlO77FCaYG32UeVgMJv3B87K3LldNtTA1/3yOA yvR0w8pXPDGzV+hcyudtSlria6bqdqJXa4vwKLjA= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afe8e52f787ca1053 X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.152 X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dex, fine - looking forward to try again, I reckon we'll need about 3 dB more. Unfortunately my antenna still won't be fully extended for a couple of days due to wind condx. EDDS = enhanced deep deep search? It might be more efficient to try the 4 hour mode then ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.12.222.129 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 18c0ce4cbca80559a8b22b14cd653174 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Can you look for us tonight with OPDS on 74.3213? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF25A6.533D5140" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF25A6.533D5140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dex, fine - looking forward to try again, I reckon we'll need about 3 dB = more. Unfortunately my antenna still won't be fully extended for a = couple of days due to wind condx. EDDS =3D enhanced deep deep search? It might be more efficient to try = the 4 hour mode then ;-) There's still a very slight frequency instability on the RX side: I'm = tracking DCF77 to eliminate the FiFi-SDR's LO drift, but currently have = no means to simultaneously correct for samplerate deviations. But I = think the residual drift (about 1 mHz) is too small to affect opds-16 or = -64 sensitivity in any way. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX=20 Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 2:18 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Can you look for us tonight with OPDS on 74.3213? Markus Vester wrote: > In past sessions, there were still weak DCF77 artifacts exactly on=20 > whole Hz frequencies. Even though these were not obvious in the higher = > noise last night, Dex' carrier might still have been slightly impeded. = > This could be cured by a small offset eg. moving 0.1 Hz down. Markus, My frequency is GPS locked so it should have been exactly on 74.323. I=20 will run again tonight on 74.3229 if you are available for another=20 try. I just changed the frequency and will let it run during the day=20 for you to try an EDDS test :) Dex ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF25A6.533D5140 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dex,
 
fine - looking forward to try again, I = reckon we'll=20 need about 3 dB more. Unfortunately my antenna still won't be fully = extended for a couple of days due to wind condx.
 
EDDS =3D enhanced deep deep search? It = might be more=20 efficient to try the 4 hour mode then ;-)
 
There's still a very slight = frequency=20 instability on the RX side: I'm tracking DCF77 to eliminate the = FiFi-SDR's LO=20 drift, but currently have no means to simultaneously correct for = samplerate=20 deviations. But I think the residual drift (about 1 mHz) is too=20 small to affect opds-16 or -64 sensitivity in any = way.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)

Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Can you look for us tonight with OPDS = on=20 74.3213?

Markus = Vester=20 wrote:
> In past sessions, there were still weak DCF77 artifacts = exactly=20 on
> whole Hz frequencies. Even though these were not obvious in = the=20 higher
> noise last night, Dex' carrier might still have been = slightly=20 impeded.
> This could be cured by a small offset eg. moving 0.1 = Hz=20 down.
Markus,

My frequency is GPS locked so it should have = been=20 exactly on 74.323.  I
will run again tonight on 74.3229 if you = are=20 available for another
try.   I just changed the frequency = and will=20 let it run during the day
for you to try an EDDS test=20 :)

Dex

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF25A6.533D5140--