Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp73677igc; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:46:55 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.211.239 with SMTP id nf15mr8814524wic.9.1392554814365; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:46:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b8si5458976wiy.49.2014.02.16.04.46.53 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:46:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WF0gx-0001Vu-Nb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:19:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WF0gw-0001Vl-M4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:19:26 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WF0gu-00081r-Ns for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:19:25 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtcMANOrAFNOk8Sf/2dsb2JhbABZgwY4g1mFPrZxAwKBDhd0giAFAQEEAQgBARkVHgEBDhgGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEDAgUhAgIUAQQaBhYIBhMIAgECAwGHYAMJDKhmoTeBKYs+gXQzgmk1gRQEjymKNZBxgy08 X-IPAS-Result: AtcMANOrAFNOk8Sf/2dsb2JhbABZgwY4g1mFPrZxAwKBDhd0giAFAQEEAQgBARkVHgEBDhgGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEDAgUhAgIUAQQaBhYIBhMIAgECAwGHYAMJDKhmoTeBKYs+gXQzgmk1gRQEjymKNZBxgy08 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,855,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="454392211" Received: from host-78-147-196-159.as13285.net (HELO your91hoehfy9g) ([78.147.196.159]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 16 Feb 2014 12:19:24 +0000 Message-ID: From: "mal hamilton" To: References: Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:19:23 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Christian This shows how poor your RX es antenna are. Stefan has remarked a number of times how strong my signal is and I have QSL CARDS and screeen shots from the USA es Canada to prove what I have said. for instance I had a QSO on CW with RN6BN on 4/5/2003 at 1138z on 137 Khz. I have the QSL card in front of me just now. Others still active in the USA will also be able to confirm this information. Contact them for further information You have some catching up to do on LF es MF before you achieve what has gone before in the early years. I used to work daily during daytime into Italy and Finland using normal CW and getting 589 at times.EG IK5ZPV, I5MXX es OH1TN For confirmation contact the above operators also VE1ZL, VE1ZZ, W1TAG, W4DEX, AA1A, NC1K but to mention a few DE MAL/G3KEV [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 318d3d373f5ffaa82e0969bd1985b258 Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Christian This shows how poor your RX es antenna are. Stefan has remarked a number of times how strong my signal is and I have QSL CARDS and screeen shots from the USA es Canada to prove what I have said. for instance I had a QSO on CW with RN6BN on 4/5/2003 at 1138z on 137 Khz. I have the QSL card in front of me just now. Others still active in the USA will also be able to confirm this information. Contact them for further information You have some catching up to do on LF es MF before you achieve what has gone before in the early years. I used to work daily during daytime into Italy and Finland using normal CW and getting 589 at times.EG IK5ZPV, I5MXX es OH1TN For confirmation contact the above operators also VE1ZL, VE1ZZ, W1TAG, W4DEX, AA1A, NC1K but to mention a few DE MAL/G3KEV From: "C. Groeger" To: Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:30 AM Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ > Mal, > We tried cw on lf last year, do you remember? > Your sigs were not audible here and only visible on twente but not audible > there. > I wonder how did you manage all this dx which such a poor signal? > 73, df5qg > > Christian Groeger > > mal hamilton schrieb: > >>Stefan es co >>Ever since the introduction of data modes 137 has gradually gone down >>hill. In the days of CW and QRSS QSO mode there were over 30 countries >>active, also BEACON mode does not help. >>The band was at its best when QSO mode was the preferred choice, DATA >>MODES and NON STOP BEACONS chased all of the CW operators away to other >>bands like 160 metres. >>I have a shack full of LF equipment and Antennas to match but never hear >>any CW acty so have gone else where like 630 and 160 metres plus all the >>other HF bands >> >>73 de mal/g3kev >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: schaefer >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 4:12 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: LF Activity - G3XIZ >> >> >> Hello Chris, >> >> Unfortunately i do not have much time this evening. However i will be in >> the shack again sunday evening, if you like to try then. I can set up a >> CW beacon on LF if you like but that does not help much in terms of QSO >> activity. >> >> Who is ready and interested and audible in CW on LF these days? >> >> What would you think is the reason for the non-activity? >> >> One reason must be the higher noisefloor, several dB higher than 2001 i >> assume, at least in urban locations. But that can't be the only reason. >> Is it the 1000 different modes or the new 630m band? Is it the >> availability of the internet? Or did "we" just became tired? Or >> combinations of that? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> Am 15.02.2014 14:25, schrieb Chris Osborn: >> LF, >> >> >> I am at present puttng out test signals on 137.7 kHz should anyone >> wish to check their RX. >> >> >> I shall be QRV on 137.7 kHz this evening from about 18.00Z again >> putting out test signals and also some CQ calls using QRSS / DFCW >> I can try CW if conditions seem favourable. >> >> >> >> It would be a shame if after Dave's excellent LF / MF artical in >> RadCom would-be ops took a listen on those bands and heard no amateur >> activity. >> >> >> A quick look in my LF receive logbook for 2001 for this weekend >> (actually 17/18 Feb) recorded the following stations - all on 136.5 kHz >> CW: >> >> >> DJ9IE (3 times) >> >> F6CNI >> G3BDQ >> GW4ALG (2 times) >> >> EI0CF (2 times) >> >> GW4HXO >> G3XDV (2 times) >> >> G8RW >> G6NB >> GM3YXM/P >> SM6PXJ >> G6RO >> ON7ZO >> PA0BWL >> >> >> Happy days! >> >> >> 73 >> Chris G3XIZ