Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp58879igc; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:32:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.92.199 with SMTP id co7mr3068380wjb.14.1392323519725; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:31:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s17si2330521wiv.58.2014.02.13.12.31.59 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:31:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WE2cs-0001u5-By for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:11:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WE2cr-0001tf-Jg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:11:13 +0000 Received: from omr-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.202]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WE2co-0000tt-LB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:11:12 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mbd01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mbd01.mx.aol.com [172.26.252.13]) by omr-d05.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 6B11370007CE6 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:11:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-237-152-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.152]) by mtaout-mbd01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 82E39380000B3 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:11:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5E9B273DC80D49F9AC20963337C96390@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <728ab.22f842d6.402d5511@aol.com> <52FBFDC2.3060700@freenet.de> <4C328A591DE1472DAD4F2F0E758FC116@F6CNI> <52FD1E29.8050904@broadpark.no> <52FD217F.6050602@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:10:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1392322268; bh=o7fpVu7YncMuvhiEMHGT4WhIQJq38uBTBjCC8wFPRhY=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tWcS1YuDPGSwOzbCdkS4CykXwshHn7FnzCWYFg7mrO/BzX4h9YwNzlmK43NhMBQml 3aeUAqYGLXZkn/Bl2orA9sa/tnDxrriJlOJVejQb/YSZd1+dZ7MFgwhNqBN64xRlm5 FazQk75rhXjp8bh/dbBcsJIZNdAcADPwnIt3Cq88= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afc0d52fd26d94169 X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.152 X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Wolf, rather than adding features to the WSQ sourcecode, why not use SpecLab as an audio preprocessor? A couple of nights ago, inserting the noise blanker function seemed to make a big improvement on the WSQ.display, and the mixer will be useful to become agile with my fixed frequency receiver. Using the free version VAC 3.12 which doesn't do audio reformatting, I had to set SpecLab to 32 kHz samplerate stereo. [...] Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.109.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 87525734ac0bb319fb3f44295fe6963b Subject: Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01CF28FF.F96FD0E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01CF28FF.F96FD0E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wolf, rather than adding features to the WSQ sourcecode, why not use SpecLab = as an audio preprocessor? A couple of nights ago, inserting the noise = blanker function seemed to make a big improvement on the WSQ.display, = and the mixer will be useful to become agile with my fixed frequency = receiver. Using the free version VAC 3.12 which doesn't do audio = reformatting, I had to set SpecLab to 32 kHz samplerate stereo.=20 Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: wolf_dl4yhf=20 Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:48 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ Hi Steinar and Andre, Thanks for the 2nd QSO Steinar - after QSY, you were perfectly readable=20 until that carrier in the center of the WSQ passband got too strong. For me, 477.3 kHz instead of 477.5 "USB dial" seems to be a better=20 choice at the moment. But I will continue to monitor the waterfall and see if other carriers=20 creep in there. I consider using a longer FFT + inverse FFT as automatic notch filter=20 for those 'super stable' carriers, which would be nulled out after=20 multiple WSQ2 symbols. Will ask the author for the sourcecodes, since I=20 am quite familiar with "C". About 472.2 "dial" .. even with the 1 kHz audio tone added, collisions=20 with CW are more or less pre-programmed.. So my vote would be for a weak-signal *QSO* frequency range at the end=20 of the band. But before that, I will observe that rarely-used segment (except maybe=20 for a beaconing mode which I don't use) a bit longer. 73, Wolf DL4YHF . Am 13.02.2014 20:34, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > I have been in qso with Wolf on 477.50, but I lost him in heavy QRM. I > will qsy 472.200 but I am probably to weak for you . > > LA5VNA S > > > > > > On 13.02.2014 19:59, Andr=E9 Guy=E9 wrote: >> HI all, >> >> I can transmit on WSQ mode now. >> >> Is somebody wants to try that ? >> >> I am on 472.200 dial USB, but I can change this QRG... >> >> 73 de F6CNI Andy. >> >> >> --- >> Ce courrier =E9lectronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel = malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. >> http://www.avast.com >> > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_000D_01CF28FF.F96FD0E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wolf,
 
rather than adding features to the = WSQ=20 sourcecode, why not use SpecLab as an audio preprocessor? A = couple of=20 nights ago, inserting the noise blanker function seemed = to make a=20 big improvement on the WSQ.display, and the mixer will be = useful=20 to become agile with my fixed frequency receiver. Using the = free=20 version VAC 3.12 which doesn't do audio reformatting, I had=20 to set SpecLab to 32 kHz samplerate stereo.
 
Best 73,
Markus = (DF6NM)

Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:48 PM
Subject: Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ

Hi=20 Steinar and Andre,

Thanks for the 2nd QSO Steinar - after QSY, = you were=20 perfectly readable
until that carrier in the center of the WSQ = passband got=20 too strong.

For me, 477.3 kHz instead of 477.5 "USB dial" seems = to be a=20 better
choice at the moment.
But I will continue to monitor the = waterfall=20 and see if other carriers
creep in there.
I consider using a = longer FFT +=20 inverse FFT as automatic notch filter
for those 'super stable' = carriers,=20 which would be nulled out after
multiple WSQ2 symbols. Will ask the = author=20 for the sourcecodes, since I
am quite familiar with = "C".

About 472.2=20 "dial" .. even with the 1 kHz audio tone added, collisions
with CW = are more=20 or less pre-programmed..
So my vote would be for a weak-signal *QSO*=20 frequency range at the end
of the band.
But before that, I will = observe=20 that rarely-used segment (except maybe
for a beaconing mode which I = don't=20 use) a bit longer.

73,
   Wolf  DL4YHF = .


Am=20 13.02.2014 20:34, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
> I have been in qso = with=20 Wolf on 477.50, but I lost him in heavy QRM. I
> will qsy 472.200 = but I am=20 probably to weak for you .
>
> LA5VNA=20 S
>
>
>
>
>
> On 13.02.2014 19:59, = Andr=E9=20 Guy=E9 wrote:
>> HI all,
>>
>> I can transmit = on WSQ=20 mode now.
>>
>> Is somebody wants to try that=20 ?
>>
>> I am on 472.200 dial USB, but I can change = this=20 QRG...
>>
>> 73 de F6CNI=20 Andy.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Ce courrier=20 =E9lectronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que = la=20 protection avast! Antivirus est active.
>> http://www.avast.com
>>
>= ;
>
>
>
>


------=_NextPart_000_000D_01CF28FF.F96FD0E0--