Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp125840igc; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:06:09 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.37.193 with SMTP id a1mr16441429wik.52.1393279568278; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:06:08 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g9si6763844wiz.23.2014.02.24.14.06.07 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 14:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WI35j-000429-5s for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:29:35 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WI35i-000420-LM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:29:34 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WI35g-0001FM-K1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:29:33 +0000 Received: from crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.248]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s1OLTTxS012892 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:29:30 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by crusoe.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6885E0D88 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:29:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <530BB9B9.9020409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:29:29 +0100 From: schaefer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <530BA152.9010301@freenet.de>,<530BA599.5080704@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCEC7A9@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FCEC7A9@ICTS-S-MBX1.luna.kuleuven.be> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Rik, Yes, aluminium seems to be not a good choice. I've now stacked 3 lemon batteries and added 4x4700uF in parallel (unfortunately i cannot find the 10F gold cap that i thought i have here) but the voltage quickly drops to 15 mV (!) when i connect the PA :-( Some more images: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20140224_213046.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20140224_215944.jpg [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5f132ffce194fb93f2267a462d849f2b Subject: Re: LF: RE: Lemon transmissions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Rik, Yes, aluminium seems to be not a good choice. I've now stacked 3 lemon batteries and added 4x4700uF in parallel (unfortunately i cannot find the 10F gold cap that i thought i have here) but the voltage quickly drops to 15 mV (!) when i connect the PA :-( Some more images: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20140224_213046.jpg https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20140224_215944.jpg I'm going to try Zn now. Hope to find some plates... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 24.02.2014 21:48, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Hi Stefan, > > I am not sure that alumium is good for making lemmon batteries, as it oxidizes almost instantly. The thin oxide layer protects the metal from further oxidation (so you won't see any oxidation), but it might affect the standard potential. > You can try Cu-Zn. That works fine a shold produce +/- 1V, so you will need some more lemmons ;-) > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens schaefer [schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de] > Verzonden: maandag 24 februari 2014 21:03 > Aan: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: Lemon transmissions > > Hi MF, > > I've bought some lemons and started to build a lemon battery. According > to http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elektrochemische_Spannungsreihe (or > english: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_electrode_potential_(data_page) ) > i've decides to use aluminium and gold (pure, 999.9 :-) ) for the > electrodes. But somehow the voltage is just 1.3 V for 2 elements in > series. Actually it should be 6.4V! I have to check if there is maybe a > short cut or so. > > This is the arrangement: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/20140224_205538.jpg > > Later i will make some tests in WSPR-2 as DK7FC/L :-) > If you have a receiver available that is "free", i would be happy for > some WSPR reports. > > But first i want to improve the battery. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >