Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
MIME-version: 1.0
Message-id: <53067ED2.9040701@broadpark.no>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 23:16:50 +0100
From: Steinar Aanesland <saanes@broadpark.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/24.3.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <728ab.22f842d6.402d5511@aol.com> <52FBFDC2.3060700@freenet.de>
 <53067122.90105@broadpark.no> <53067BE2.7090900@freenet.de>
In-reply-to: <53067BE2.7090900@freenet.de>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: LF: CQ CQ DL4YHF WSQ2
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Thanks for your reply :)
If I can be of any help, RX or something , just send me a email :)

I am on my cabin in Stavern near Larvik now , but I will be back on my 
home qth Sunday

LA5VNA S


On 20.02.2014 23:04, wolf_dl4yhf wrote:
> Hi Steinar,
>
> Making some progress, but still trying to find out why Rik's recording 
> of my signal didn't decode on his PC, and doesn't decode when played 
> back (via VLC player) on my machine, but decodes without any problems 
> on Con's (ZL2AFP's) machine.
> All using the original program, but the modified version behaves the 
> same way.
>
> I am now adding an option to decode WSQ directly from a wave file 
> (without using a media player), which may be helpful later.
> Also, there will be the possibility to record the received audio in a 
> wave file (directly in the WSQ program), also for the purpose of 
> debugging.
>
> Quite likely, the problem will boil down to the soundcard's sampling 
> rate, which is 32000 S/seconds in WSQ.
>
> 73,
>   Wolf DL4YHF .
>
>
> Am 20.02.2014 22:18, schrieb Steinar Aanesland:
>> Hi Wolf
>>
>> Any news about new version of WSQ ?
>>
>> LA5VNA
>>
>
>
>