Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp72523igc; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:17:36 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.37.178 with SMTP id z18mr8953104wij.46.1392553055068; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:17:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bv8si7971658wjb.146.2014.02.16.04.17.34 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 04:17:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WEzhu-000125-MM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:16:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WEzhu-00011w-3T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:16:22 +0000 Received: from smtp1.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.51] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WEzhr-0007j0-Ei for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:16:20 +0000 Received: from [123.200.236.228] (unknown [123.200.236.228]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A55A4140046 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:16:10 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <53009DF5.2050302@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:16:05 +1100 From: edgar User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5300522F.4030809@virginbroadband.com.au> <530093B3.7080504@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <530093B3.7080504@freenet.de> X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 123.200.191.51 (smtp1.virginbroadband.com.au) used invalid HELO/EHLO smtp.virginbroadband.com.au - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Wolf, Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately the site you mentioned does not show the signals clearly the frequencies. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [123.200.191.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: Russian Alpha stations Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Wolf, Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately the site you mentioned does not show the signals clearly the frequencies. I also should have said BETA stations not ALPHA stations. In this document in Table 15 and Table 16 there are details of the transmissions. http://digilander.libero.it/occultazioni/segnali-di-tempo.pdf. Unfortunately, in the image, the carrier on 25.0 kHz covers the Morse code ID. However the other 40 Hz and other pulses can be seen, along with the 25.1 kHz, 25.5 kHz, 23 kHz and 20.5 kHz carrier signal segments. From the transmission times in Table 15 it would appear to be RJH99, Nizhniy Novgorod, Russia,14609 km from here. I would just like confirmation of that if possible. Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania.