Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp62794igc; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.77.129 with SMTP id s1mr4336981wiw.56.1392328023911; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:03 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ba4si2217114wjb.78.2014.02.13.13.47.03 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WE3hp-0002sP-1T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:20:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WE3ho-0002sG-H5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:20:24 +0000 Received: from mout0.freenet.de ([195.4.92.90]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WE3hm-0001Ih-Uv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 21:20:23 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE3hm-0003iW-5q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:20:22 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:45374 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE3hm-0006eP-02 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:20:22 +0100 Received: from mx13.freenet.de ([195.4.92.23]:41530) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE3ew-0006d7-Uw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:26 +0100 Received: from blfd-4db00b62.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.11.98]:4943 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx13.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE3ew-0000Iz-LV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:26 +0100 Message-ID: <52FD3664.40908@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:17:24 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <728ab.22f842d6.402d5511@aol.com> <52FBFDC2.3060700@freenet.de> <4C328A591DE1472DAD4F2F0E758FC116@F6CNI> <52FD1E29.8050904@broadpark.no> <52FD1FC1.4090801@broadpark.no> <52FD21FF.5080008@freenet.de> <1FB0FC1B145E4C05BDF0BEEEF62F40A9@F6CNI> <52FD2CB0.209@freenet.de> <001701cf28fe$f02c19e0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> In-Reply-To: <001701cf28fe$f02c19e0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> X-Originated-At: 77.176.11.98!4943 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Marco, Thanks for the info. Indeed the QSB is deep now; Andy F6CNI just went up to easy 'audible' copy and then went back into the noise but still printed about 90% in WSQ2. Do you also have permanent 'carriers' in the WSQ frequency range in Italy (and elsewhere) ? Suggestions also from others about a preferred frequency range for this QSO mode ? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.90 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 1bc6486c2865e7dc2ff7578e6d7fc226 Subject: Re: LF: Re: De F6CNI : Test WSQ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070607030804060607050404" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070607030804060607050404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Marco, Thanks for the info. Indeed the QSB is deep now; Andy F6CNI just went up to easy 'audible' copy and then went back into the noise but still printed about 90% in WSQ2. Do you also have permanent 'carriers' in the WSQ frequency range in Italy (and elsewhere) ? Suggestions also from others about a preferred frequency range for this QSO mode ? Here, the carrier on 478.404 kHz is now so strong that i can see 'modulation sidebands' (which may also be the effect of a 'pumping' AGC) up to 20 Hz above and below it... so just outside the decoder's audio frequency range when the RX is at 477.3 kHz in USB. 73, Wolf DL4YHF Am 13.02.2014 22:02, schrieb Marco Cadeddu: > Hi Wolf, > copied a couple of your cq and now partial copy... > GL de Marco IK1HSS > --------------070607030804060607050404 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello Marco,

Thanks for the info. Indeed the QSB is deep now; Andy F6CNI just went up to easy 'audible' copy and then went back into the noise but still printed about 90% in WSQ2.
Do you also have permanent 'carriers' in the WSQ frequency range in Italy (and elsewhere) ?
Suggestions also from others about a preferred frequency range for this QSO mode ?

Here, the carrier on 478.404 kHz is now so strong that i can see 'modulation sidebands' (which may also be the effect of a 'pumping' AGC) up to 20 Hz above and below it... so just outside the decoder's audio frequency range when the RX is at 477.3 kHz in USB.

73,
  Wolf DL4YHF




Am 13.02.2014 22:02, schrieb Marco Cadeddu:
Hi Wolf,
 
copied a couple of your cq and now partial copy...
GL de Marco IK1HSS


--------------070607030804060607050404--