Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp57376igc; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:04:04 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.103.227 with SMTP id fz3mr7821370wib.29.1392321844226; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:04:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id am4si2018876wjc.165.2014.02.13.12.04.03 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:04:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WE2KW-0001VY-W6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:52:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WE2KW-0001VP-HL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:52:16 +0000 Received: from mout3.freenet.de ([195.4.92.93]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WE2KU-0000li-Js for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:52:15 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.142] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE2KT-0000i0-Lz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:52:13 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:60233 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE2KT-00034q-I7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:52:13 +0100 Received: from mx7.freenet.de ([195.4.92.17]:47453) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE2Gg-0008Ln-4l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:48:18 +0100 Received: from blfd-4db00b62.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.11.98]:4373 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx7.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1WE2Gf-0005oU-Nr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:48:18 +0100 Message-ID: <52FD217F.6050602@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 20:48:15 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <728ab.22f842d6.402d5511@aol.com> <52FBFDC2.3060700@freenet.de> <4C328A591DE1472DAD4F2F0E758FC116@F6CNI> <52FD1E29.8050904@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <52FD1E29.8050904@broadpark.no> X-Originated-At: 77.176.11.98!4373 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steinar and Andre, Thanks for the 2nd QSO Steinar - after QSY, you were perfectly readable until that carrier in the center of the WSQ passband got too strong. For me, 477.3 kHz instead of 477.5 "USB dial" seems to be a better choice at the moment. But I will continue to monitor the waterfall and see if other carriers creep in there. I consider using a longer FFT + inverse FFT as automatic notch filter for those 'super stable' carriers, which would be nulled out after multiple WSQ2 symbols. Will ask the author for the sourcecodes, since I am quite familiar with "C". [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.93 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7ab87d4d3ea1d9dcb73a78e83fe4d608 Subject: Re: LF: De F6CNI : Test WSQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Steinar and Andre, Thanks for the 2nd QSO Steinar - after QSY, you were perfectly readable until that carrier in the center of the WSQ passband got too strong. For me, 477.3 kHz instead of 477.5 "USB dial" seems to be a better choice at the moment. But I will continue to monitor the waterfall and see if other carriers creep in there. I consider using a longer FFT + inverse FFT as automatic notch filter for those 'super stable' carriers, which would be nulled out after multiple WSQ2 symbols. Will ask the author for the sourcecodes, since I am quite familiar with "C". About 472.2 "dial" .. even with the 1 kHz audio tone added, collisions with CW are more or less pre-programmed.. So my vote would be for a weak-signal *QSO* frequency range at the end of the band. But before that, I will observe that rarely-used segment (except maybe for a beaconing mode which I don't use) a bit longer. 73, Wolf DL4YHF . Am 13.02.2014 20:34, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > I have been in qso with Wolf on 477.50, but I lost him in heavy QRM. I > will qsy 472.200 but I am probably to weak for you . > > LA5VNA S > > > > > > On 13.02.2014 19:59, André Guyé wrote: >> HI all, >> >> I can transmit on WSQ mode now. >> >> Is somebody wants to try that ? >> >> I am on 472.200 dial USB, but I can change this QRG... >> >> 73 de F6CNI Andy. >> >> >> --- >> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce que la protection avast! Antivirus est active. >> http://www.avast.com >> > > > > >