Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp35298igc; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 12:17:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.119.168 with SMTP id kv8mr7130281wjb.41.1391285874084; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:17:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cl9si1713209wib.5.2014.02.01.12.17.53 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 12:17:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W9gKk-0001yC-Nx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:34:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W9gKk-0001y3-6H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:34:30 +0000 Received: from omr-d09.mx.aol.com ([205.188.108.133]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W9gKi-0002yU-AF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 19:34:29 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mbe02.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mbe02.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.174]) by omr-d09.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 48F3A702000B4 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:34:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-237-152-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.237.152]) by mtaout-mbe02.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 6EFC9380000A3 for ; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:34:23 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <2C298FA71DBE4891AD19AFA27DEF513B@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <000f01cf1d9e$700b49e0$0802a8c0@acer> <52EA67D4.3060604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <08be01cf1de6$5b817c90$128475b0$@comcast.net> <52EBB90D.6040101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ED24D7.8030405@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 20:34:20 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1391283266; bh=2miiLl4/KA6Az30ogoqgngyuXjf+fmKlZoLaP8N8vWc=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xhKymDyga8PULOsumRWRrCIUDPll60w2OMH5Psk9BDH66RdAe4ToOmLPNo6EqWu5+ /on6pWuh9UT7dMLZPVlktdZHxcUTCiyrELh6h7DgWPf94gCuge9fJPZ49i1vHx0Vbx yapnJwFrZPOJT6IviJDYXnVKHmiqqZVOp283tb5s= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afeae52ed4c3f746a X-AOL-IP: 95.91.237.152 X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, running two 478 µHz "6000" windows centered on 5755 Hz (on the grabber, but much QRM here) and also 17265 Hz (offline) which seems more quiet. So hoping for a long carrier... On which of the two frequencies would you expect to radiate more power? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.108.133 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CF1F8C.FC455B40" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CF1F8C.FC455B40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan, running two 478 =B5Hz "6000" windows centered on 5755 Hz (on the = grabber, but much QRM here) and also 17265 Hz (offline) which seems more = quiet. So hoping for a long carrier... On which of the two frequencies = would you expect to radiate more power? BTW Today I have updated SpecLab from version 2.79 b08 to b10 (Jan 26), = and it seems that GPS 1-pps sync is finally working well now, even with = 42 =B5Hz resolution. Good luck for the test! 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 5:46 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD VLF,=20 This evening and night i'm planning to transmit on 5.755 kHz, using the = large antenna, the large coil and the large PA :-) I don't know what can be expected and how the system works at that = frequency. Actually it is just a first test for playing arround and = doing some measurements :-)=20 If some nearby stations want to give it a try, maybe even in 3HD, then = don't hesitate :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CF1F8C.FC455B40 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan,
 
running two 478 =B5Hz "6000" windows = centered on 5755=20 Hz (on the grabber, but much QRM here) and also 17265 Hz (offline) which = seems=20 more quiet. So hoping for a long carrier... On which of the two = frequencies=20 would you expect to radiate more power?
 
BTW Today I have updated SpecLab from = version 2.79=20 b08 to b10 (Jan 26), and it seems that GPS 1-pps sync is finally = working=20 well now, even with 42 =B5Hz resolution.
 
Good luck for the test!
 
73, Markus=20 (DF6NM)
 
 
 

From: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 5:46 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD

VLF, =

This=20 evening and night i'm planning to transmit on 5.755 kHz, = using the=20 large antenna, the large coil and the large PA :-)
I don't know what = can be=20 expected and how the system works at that frequency. Actually it is just = a=20 first test for playing arround and doing some measurements :-) =
If some=20 nearby stations want to give it a try, maybe even in 3HD, then = don't=20 hesitate :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CF1F8C.FC455B40--