Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp116256igc; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 00:48:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.73.196 with SMTP id n4mr7834561wiv.24.1391417311388; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:48:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f9si705871wix.75.2014.02.03.00.48.30 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WAEzi-0003Js-L9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:35:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WAEzh-0003Jj-Va for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:35:05 +0000 Received: from qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.64]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WAEze-0000cE-Ro for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:35:04 +0000 Received: from omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19]) by qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id MkaG1n0010QkzPwA7kb0tl; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:35:00 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.180.190]) by omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Mkaf1n00G46sWly8NkakEQ; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 08:34:55 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: <000f01cf1d9e$700b49e0$0802a8c0@acer> <52EA67D4.3060604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <08be01cf1de6$5b817c90$128475b0$@comcast.net> <52EBB90D.6040101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ED24D7.8030405@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <2C298FA71DBE4891AD19AFA27DEF513B@White> In-Reply-To: <2C298FA71DBE4891AD19AFA27DEF513B@White> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 01:34:36 -0700 Message-ID: <0c8101cf20ba$cf43b2c0$6dcb1840$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJz8+QrnqcKpHJYb2YZ9oDGFnFlnwKcFvPsAjX7FfgBOU0eMgDz/MwEAZU/PuIBrIJsvpkHg/zw Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1391416500; bh=s3t2+DcGtBNPYEInzMTCFwTnkqajoQrjo/j3duUAlrM=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=K5R/dD8+O/YyB/ahF55YQm+O1SrYR5cD46AcdGhYW8EkqSAtKjq1/fnQ8nbTR/uNT Eka29HnyMeY64QJB/jiuueyMKlSgamYwppAKmi4HCUDUjQhRkqi3j1D6J4eGOTxAIZ QGeOLAmqutsjdlRYGGejHVPO4XoY+EurnEVtYYmgU+NXQF77gfUZGR65zUilVoCV8K 70M7EmfeGAlKZstPn16LbJL0CLKCj0nEjF3llQiA01215wf4m6kpPZM+/QFVuCwnRn CbLzJTzOVeN63EHwyMbJ9OPLEy+kOggnDPxLrV5r+xHOz/jPbbXvElMppdepOoj407 /rmS2wyJ/oNww== X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus, Thank you for the information on SpecLab. Today will be my first attempt to use external synchronization with SpecLab, and my most-accurate time standard has 1-pps and 10MHz outputs. I have hoped to be able to use the 1-pps output for 42uHz (or better if possible) resolution, but something that you or others had mentioned a month ago made me unsure about the 1-pps interface. Thank you for mentioning the SpecLab update and its performance with 1-pps synchronization. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.64 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: caa2bbf6eb61e70e03599bec833fb637 Subject: RE: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0C82_01CF2080.22E5C520" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0C82_01CF2080.22E5C520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markus, =20 Thank you for the information on SpecLab. Today will be my first attempt = to use external synchronization with SpecLab, and my most-accurate time standard has 1-pps and 10MHz outputs. I have hoped to be able to use the 1-pps output for 42uHz (or better if possible) resolution, but something that you or others had mentioned a month ago made me unsure about the = 1-pps interface. Thank you for mentioning the SpecLab update and its = performance with 1-pps synchronization. =20 73 Jim AA5BW =20 =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus Vester Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 12:34 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD =20 Stefan, =20 running two 478 =B5Hz "6000" windows centered on 5755 Hz (on the = grabber, but much QRM here) and also 17265 Hz (offline) which seems more quiet. So = hoping for a long carrier... On which of the two frequencies would you expect = to radiate more power? =20 BTW Today I have updated SpecLab from version 2.79 b08 to b10 (Jan 26), = and it seems that GPS 1-pps sync is finally working well now, even with 42 = =B5Hz resolution. =20 Good luck for the test! =20 73, Markus (DF6NM) =20 =20 =20 =20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer =20 Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 5:46 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: DXl VLF experiments in 3HD =20 VLF,=20 This evening and night i'm planning to transmit on 5.755 kHz, using the large antenna, the large coil and the large PA :-) I don't know what can be expected and how the system works at that frequency. Actually it is just a first test for playing arround and = doing some measurements :-)=20 If some nearby stations want to give it a try, maybe even in 3HD, then = don't hesitate :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_0C82_01CF2080.22E5C520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Markus,

 

Thank you for the information on SpecLab. Today will be my first = attempt to use external synchronization with SpecLab, and my = most-accurate time standard has 1-pps and 10MHz outputs. I have hoped to = be able to use the 1-pps output for 42uHz (or better if possible) = resolution, but something that you or others had mentioned a month ago = made me  unsure about the 1-pps interface. Thank you for mentioning = the SpecLab update and its performance with 1-pps = synchronization.

 

73  Jim AA5BW

 

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Markus = Vester
Sent: Saturday, February 1, 2014 12:34 PM
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: DXl VLF = experiments in 3HD

 

Stefan,

 

running two = 478 =B5Hz "6000" windows centered on 5755 Hz (on the grabber, = but much QRM here) and also 17265 Hz (offline) which seems more quiet. = So hoping for a long carrier... On which of the two frequencies would = you expect to radiate more = power?

 

BTW Today I = have updated SpecLab from version 2.79 b08 to b10 (Jan 26), and it seems = that GPS 1-pps sync is finally working well now, = even with 42 =B5Hz = resolution.

 

Good luck = for the test!

 

73, Markus = (DF6NM)

 

 

 

 <= /o:p>

From:= = Stefan Sch=E4fer =

Sent:= = Saturday, February 01, 2014 5:46 PM

Subject: LF: DXl = VLF experiments in 3HD

 

VLF, =

This evening and night i'm planning to transmit on 5.755 = kHz, using the large antenna, the large coil and the large PA = :-)
I don't know what can be expected and how the system works at = that frequency. Actually it is just a first test for playing arround = and doing some measurements :-)
If some nearby stations want to = give it a try, maybe even in 3HD, then don't hesitate = :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

------=_NextPart_000_0C82_01CF2080.22E5C520--