Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp65103igc; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:32:00 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.19.35 with SMTP id b3mr8360358wie.20.1392330719449; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:31:59 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gx8si4915688wib.71.2014.02.13.14.31.58 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:31:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1WE4Pb-00031q-H1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:05:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1WE4Pb-00031h-1P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:05:39 +0000 Received: from vsmtp12.tin.it ([212.216.176.206]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1WE4PZ-0001SV-7E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:05:37 +0000 Received: from marco09cqcdi12 (80.182.51.33) by vsmtp12.tin.it (8.6.060.28) id 5214CA7A1819D005 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 23:05:36 +0100 Message-ID: <002501cf2907$b8efb1e0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> From: "Marco Cadeddu" To: References: <728ab.22f842d6.402d5511@aol.com> <52FBFDC2.3060700@freenet.de> <4C328A591DE1472DAD4F2F0E758FC116@F6CNI> <52FD1E29.8050904@broadpark.no> <52FD1FC1.4090801@broadpark.no> <52FD21FF.5080008@freenet.de> <1FB0FC1B145E4C05BDF0BEEEF62F40A9@F6CNI> <52FD2CB0.209@freenet.de> <001701cf28fe$f02c19e0$0201a8c0@marco09cqcdi12> <52FD3664.40908@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:05:34 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Wolf, copied some further partial exchange.. At least on my side the qrg is fine no special interferences here but I was using the miniwhip. Being forced to listen.. no tx antenna till the weather and other tasks improve :-( so manly listening on 137 or lower bands. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.216.176.206 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (marcocadeddu[at]tin.it) -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: d0d76c369792b807e0925732d18ad9b1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: De F6CNI : Test WSQ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0022_01CF2907.B83A92B0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CF2907.B83A92B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Wolf, copied some further partial exchange.. At least on my side the qrg is fine no special interferences here but I = was using the miniwhip. Being forced to listen.. no tx antenna till the weather and other tasks = improve :-( so manly listening on 137 or lower bands. 73 Marco IK1HSS By the way WSQ is running on a net book with W7 starter, on the other PC = with W2000 the software doesn't start giving a strange error message...I = have to investicate.. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: wolf_dl4yhf=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:17 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: De F6CNI : Test WSQ Hello Marco, Thanks for the info. Indeed the QSB is deep now; Andy F6CNI just went = up to easy 'audible' copy and then went back into the noise but still = printed about 90% in WSQ2. Do you also have permanent 'carriers' in the WSQ frequency range in = Italy (and elsewhere) ? Suggestions also from others about a preferred frequency range for = this QSO mode ? Here, the carrier on 478.404 kHz is now so strong that i can see = 'modulation sidebands' (which may also be the effect of a 'pumping' AGC) = up to 20 Hz above and below it... so just outside the decoder's audio = frequency range when the RX is at 477.3 kHz in USB. 73, Wolf DL4YHF=20 Am 13.02.2014 22:02, schrieb Marco Cadeddu: Hi Wolf, copied a couple of your cq and now partial copy... GL de Marco IK1HSS ------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CF2907.B83A92B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Wolf,
 
copied some further partial = exchange..
At least on my side the qrg is fine no = special=20 interferences here but I was using the miniwhip.
Being forced to listen.. no tx antenna = till the=20 weather and other tasks improve :-( so manly listening on 137 or lower=20 bands.
 
73 Marco IK1HSS
 
By the way WSQ is running on a net book = with W7=20 starter, on the other PC with W2000 the software doesn't start giving a = strange=20 error message...I have to investicate..
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 wolf_dl4yhf=20
Sent: Thursday, February 13, = 2014 9:17=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: De F6CNI : = Test=20 WSQ

Hello Marco,

Thanks for the info. = Indeed the=20 QSB is deep now; Andy F6CNI just went up to easy 'audible' copy and = then went=20 back into the noise but still printed about 90% in WSQ2.
Do you = also have=20 permanent 'carriers' in the WSQ frequency range in Italy (and = elsewhere)=20 ?
Suggestions also from others about a preferred frequency range = for this=20 QSO mode ?

Here, the carrier on 478.404 kHz is now so strong = that i can=20 see 'modulation sidebands' (which may also be the effect of a = 'pumping' AGC)=20 up to 20 Hz above and below it... so just outside the decoder's audio=20 frequency range when the RX is at 477.3 kHz in = USB.

73,
  Wolf=20 DL4YHF




Am 13.02.2014 22:02, schrieb Marco=20 Cadeddu:
Hi Wolf,
 
copied a couple of your cq and now = partial=20 copy...
GL de Marco=20 IK1HSS


------=_NextPart_000_0022_01CF2907.B83A92B0--