Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <FC462CAA3B714890A38DE853F41EB905@Black>
From: "Markus Vester" <markusvester@aol.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <CAHAQVWNBD=VQ5DiaC1Ac8yn1k+11f+ugzMcoOtp82dZ1iaW8gA@mail.gmail.com><52E7C438.7050205@psk31.plus.com><1390936735.43137.YahooMailNeo@web171404.mail.ir2.yahoo.com><trinity-40b68802-01c0-4f4b-9dfb-3e4e2f388e7e-1390943886815@3capp-gmx-bs07> <CAHAQVWN6uFPnWrJOsWH+Hz=WtE8e4Udqj+OWr522TykCTDzgyQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHAQVWN6uFPnWrJOsWH+Hz=WtE8e4Udqj+OWr522TykCTDzgyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:43:40 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01CF1C7A.640C9DD0"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CF1C7A.640C9DD0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Laura, Roger,

but then, why not transmit on 8.9 kHz? Or 30 kHz, or any other unused =
frequency? The ERP we can achieve on (V)LF will anyhow be so weak that =
no one will notice it, unless he's really looking for it.

73, Markus

----- Original Message -----=20
From: Roger Lapthorn=20
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:34 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations


=DDes, I agree with Laura. The former, Dave, is not achievable in the =
real world.=20

As long as no undue interference (an OFCOM phrase, well used)  to =
official services is caused, everyone is happy. In reality it is easy to =
suppress signals above 8.3kHz down a very long way.=20


73s

Roger G3XBM


On 28 January 2014 21:18, LZ <Laura.Zepam@gmx.de> wrote:

  Dave,

  You wrote:
  > ... In other words NO signal must escape that is higher than that =
8.3 kHz limit -That is it!! -end of!! Dave=20

  No, wrong.
  Right: "In other words NO *interfering* signal must escape that is =
higher than that 8.3 kHz limit..."

  Laura

  Gesandt von mein PettiFogPhone


--=20

http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm


------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CF1C7A.640C9DD0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META name=3DGENERATOR content=3D"MSHTML 9.00.8112.16526">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>Laura, Roger,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>but then, why not transmit on 8.9 kHz? =
Or 30 kHz,=20
or any other unused frequency?&nbsp;The ERP we can achieve on (V)LF will =
anyhow=20
be so weak that no one will notice it, unless he's really looking for=20
it.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial>73, Markus</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2 face=3DArial></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
title=3Drogerlapthorn@gmail.com =
href=3D"mailto:rogerlapthorn@gmail.com">Roger=20
Lapthorn</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Drsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:34 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency=20
allocations</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr>
<DIV>
<DIV>=DDes, I agree with Laura. The former, Dave, is not achievable in =
the real=20
world. <BR><BR>As long as no undue interference (an OFCOM phrase, well=20
used)&nbsp; to official services is caused, everyone is happy. In =
reality it is=20
easy to suppress signals above 8.3kHz down a very long way.=20
<BR><BR></DIV>73s<BR></DIV>Roger G3XBM<BR></DIV>
<DIV class=3Dgmail_extra><BR><BR>
<DIV class=3Dgmail_quote>On 28 January 2014 21:18, LZ <SPAN =
dir=3Dltr>&lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:Laura.Zepam@gmx.de" =
target=3D_blank>Laura.Zepam@gmx.de</A>&gt;</SPAN>=20
wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; =
PADDING-LEFT: 1ex"=20
class=3Dgmail_quote>Dave,<BR><BR>You wrote:<BR>&gt; ... In other words =
NO signal=20
  must escape that is higher than that&nbsp;8.3&nbsp;kHz limit -That is =
it!!=20
  -end of!!&nbsp;Dave&nbsp;<BR><BR>No, wrong.<BR>Right: "In other words =
NO=20
  *interfering* signal must escape that is higher than that 8.3 kHz=20
  limit..."<BR><BR>Laura<BR><BR>Gesandt von mein=20
PettiFogPhone<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR clear=3Dall><BR>-- <BR>
<DIV dir=3Dltr><A href=3D"http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/"=20
target=3D_blank>http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/</A><BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.g3xbm.co.uk" =
target=3D_blank>http://www.g3xbm.co.uk</A><BR><A=20
href=3D"https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/"=20
target=3D_blank>https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/</A><BR><A=20
href=3D"http://qss2.blogspot.com/"=20
target=3D_blank>http://qss2.blogspot.com/</A><BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM"=20
target=3D_blank>http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm</A><BR><BR></DIV></DIV>=
</BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0018_01CF1C7A.640C9DD0--