Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp146707igc; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:49:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.211.141 with SMTP id nc13mr5099696wic.1.1389383380353; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:49:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ex2si1905606wib.72.2014.01.10.11.49.39 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass header.i=@mx.aol.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W1hMm-0006Uv-N7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:03:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W1hMm-0006Um-6o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:03:36 +0000 Received: from omr-d05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.109.202]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W1hMk-0000eA-3y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:03:35 +0000 Received: from mtaout-mcd01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mcd01.mx.aol.com [172.26.223.205]) by omr-d05.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 4B89B70002C5F for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:03:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from White (95-91-238-155-dynip.superkabel.de [95.91.238.155]) by mtaout-mcd01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 5BF2B38000087 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 14:03:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: From: "Markus Vester" To: References: ,<52C6EE6C.31591.1BEE17D@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <52C711F7.2080905@gmx.de> <52CFFB49.7060803@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:03:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1389380611; bh=3t0AuGcdSIg01bCqpjwrP6suUAqfk8c+OOC0XNmReoA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Qd96/J8pGEZ5K0O4HZ2wQDbL3m3mJr971UdbXy2syZnM9Q8xlh2kUyw4WWhyV8jBP /ly6ALWCyBAbE6AXSn9s8mq/Eu7vPpc8hnrBPeRbpw9SGCAXnbnBvCkhuSr274bqeV lVqkRVpT30bK/AZ5ra+sG/5fgr/nnOlwUMuTnX14= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1adfcd52d044004e8b X-AOL-IP: 95.91.238.155 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe, when you were sending CW a couple of days ago, the coherent carrier was detectable in my 438 uHz spectrogram in broad daylight, until 12 UT! So I'm wondering how a low power straight carrier would fare during night and day? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.109.202 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 860e51ceecdf98b32e8eba101d9d472d Subject: Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF0E3F.055E0510" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF0E3F.055E0510 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Joe, when you were sending CW a couple of days ago, the coherent carrier was = detectable in my 438 uHz spectrogram in broad daylight, until 12 UT! So = I'm wondering how a low power straight carrier would fare during night = and day? Best 73, Markus From: jcraig@mun.ca=20 Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:44 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP TA Hi Hartmut, Yes, DCF39 must be a real pest as it is so close geographically and in frequency. You seem to be dealing with it very effectively. Thank-you for running the grabber. It's a pest over here too, but sometimes useful to check the RX system. The TX will be on again tonight. In keeping with the spirit of energy conservation being requested by our power company, the TX will run at <5 watts tonight to the 100m wire. I hope to watch for the signals on your grabber. Cheers Joe VO1NA On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Hartmut Wolff wrote: > Hello Joe, > > thank you for your kind words! > > Still struggling here with my local Pest DCF39. Between 03:15 and = 04:40 UTC=20 > DCF39 was sending a higher pulse frequence. That is the reason of the = higher=20 > noise level at that time and poorer reception of your beacon. > > Thank you for your signal! > > 73 > Hartmut > > > Am 2014-01-10 13:26, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>=20 >> Hello Hartmut and Group, >>=20 >> Even with only 65 watts from the TX, strong QRSS100 signals were seen = on >> Hartmut's grabber at 137.777 so the power was cut to <10 watts by >> reducing the drain voltage of the class E amp to 12 V. The grabber >> traces faded substantially, but rebounded to clearly readable around >> 0630 utc. >>=20 >> Congrats on your impressive RX setup, Martmut! >>=20 >> 73 >> Joe VO1NA >>=20 >>=20 > > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF0E3F.055E0510 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Joe,
 
when you were sending CW a couple of = days ago, the=20 coherent carrier was detectable in my 438 uHz = spectrogram in=20 broad daylight, until 12 UT! So I'm wondering how a low power = straight=20 carrier would fare during night and day?
 
Best 73,
Markus
 

From: jcraig@mun.ca
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:44 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: Hartmut's Grabber -- QRP = TA

Hi Hartmut,

Yes, DCF39 must be a real pest as it = is so=20 close geographically and
in frequency. You seem to be dealing with it = very=20 effectively.
Thank-you for running the grabber.

It's a pest = over here=20 too, but sometimes useful to check the RX system.

The TX will be = on again=20 tonight. In keeping with the spirit of energy
conservation being = requested by=20 our power company, the TX will run
at <5 watts tonight to the 100m = wire.  I hope to watch for the signals
on your=20 grabber.

Cheers
Joe VO1NA

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Hartmut = Wolff=20 wrote:

> Hello Joe,
>
> thank you for your kind=20 words!
>
> Still struggling here with my local Pest DCF39. = Between=20 03:15 and 04:40 UTC
> DCF39 was sending a higher pulse frequence. = That is=20 the reason of the higher
> noise level at that time and poorer = reception=20 of your beacon.
>
> Thank you for your = signal!
>
>=20 73
> Hartmut
>
>
> Am 2014-01-10 13:26, schrieb = jcraig@mun.ca:
>> =
>> Hello=20 Hartmut and Group,
>>
>> Even with only 65 watts from = the TX,=20 strong QRSS100 signals were seen on
>> Hartmut's grabber at = 137.777 so=20 the power was cut to <10 watts by
>> reducing the drain = voltage of=20 the class E amp to 12 V. The grabber
>> traces faded = substantially, but=20 rebounded to clearly readable around
>> 0630 utc.
>>=20
>> Congrats on your impressive RX setup, Martmut!
>>=20
>> 73
>> Joe VO1NA
>>
>>=20
>
>
>
>
>

------=_NextPart_000_0003_01CF0E3F.055E0510--