Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp71773igc; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:01:52 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.99.39 with SMTP id en7mr4494498wib.10.1390593711653; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:01:51 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o8si1152056wjf.36.2014.01.24.12.01.50 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W6mVM-0006F9-Mo for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:33:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W6mVM-0006Es-64 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:33:28 +0000 Received: from dub0-omc1-s29.dub0.hotmail.com ([157.55.0.228]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W6mVK-0001Ch-3p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:33:27 +0000 Received: from DUB114-W55 ([157.55.0.238]) by dub0-omc1-s29.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:33:24 -0800 X-TMN: [svVJWc2OvdueCGfHiEbmkbgA1mKo1qwX] X-Originating-Email: [bvgbob@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Lubos To: _RSGB_LF Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 20:33:24 +0100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20140124210515.Horde.HA7jDef4KYxS4rlrCYRE7sA@posti.anvianet.fi> References: ,,,<20140124210515.Horde.HA7jDef4KYxS4rlrCYRE7sA@posti.anvianet.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2014 19:33:24.0774 (UTC) FILETIME=[25F6F460:01CF193B] X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Paul-Henrik!Yesss... It might be true. Thanks! The signal was very strong here, but now it is gone. :-) Lubos, OK2BVG > Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:05:15 +0200 > From: phl@netikka.fi > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Unknown signal > > My wild bet is on RMP / Kaliningrad Naval Base. > > > Before we moved down to 472...479 kHz I kept an ear on the proposed > band over a year or so. Back then RMP made quite regular "RTTY" > transmissions with center frequency 474.0 kHz. Usually starting > transmissions in "RTTY-keyed" CW so the callsign could be copied by > ear. They vanished from the QRG before amateur activity started and I > thought it might have had something to do with the new allocation. > > I remember this so well because I laughed at all the fears of hams > "jamming" aero-NDB's, while this firethrower blasted away spot on the > "BIA" carrier. > > > Anyone with DF-capability that can check if Kaliningrad in on the > null-bearing? > > As a curiosity RMP is also sending WX etc. in CW on 583.0 kHz, > starting 16.00 UTC as far as I have noticed. Can be copied here on the > AM car-radio on 585 kHz if there is a suitable BC-carrier on 585 kHz > acting as a beat oscillator. (This is how i found them by accident > years ago) > > > BR > > Paul-Henrik, OH1LSQ > > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [157.55.0.228 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (bvgbob[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: bde53fa3678f346afe39dd99e3e185db Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_9fef649c-858c-4e0f-90cb-914b2003040e_" Subject: RE: LF: Unknown signal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AMATEUR_PORN, FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --_9fef649c-858c-4e0f-90cb-914b2003040e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Paul-Henrik!Yesss... It might be true. Thanks! The signal was very st= rong here=2C but now it is gone. :-) Lubos=2C OK2BVG **************************************************** > Date: Fri=2C 24 Jan 2014 21:05:15 +0200 > From: phl@netikka.fi > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Unknown signal >=20 > My wild bet is on RMP / Kaliningrad Naval Base. >=20 >=20 > Before we moved down to 472...479 kHz I kept an ear on the proposed =20 > band over a year or so. Back then RMP made quite regular "RTTY" =20 > transmissions with center frequency 474.0 kHz. Usually starting =20 > transmissions in "RTTY-keyed" CW so the callsign could be copied by =20 > ear. They vanished from the QRG before amateur activity started and I =20 > thought it might have had something to do with the new allocation. >=20 > I remember this so well because I laughed at all the fears of hams =20 > "jamming" aero-NDB's=2C while this firethrower blasted away spot on the = =20 > "BIA" carrier. >=20 >=20 > Anyone with DF-capability that can check if Kaliningrad in on the =20 > null-bearing? >=20 > As a curiosity RMP is also sending WX etc. in CW on 583.0 kHz=2C =20 > starting 16.00 UTC as far as I have noticed. Can be copied here on the =20 > AM car-radio on 585 kHz if there is a suitable BC-carrier on 585 kHz =20 > acting as a beat oscillator. (This is how i found them by accident =20 > years ago) >=20 >=20 > BR >=20 > Paul-Henrik=2C OH1LSQ >=20 >=20 = --_9fef649c-858c-4e0f-90cb-914b2003040e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Paul-Henrik!
Yesss... = It might be true. Thanks! The signal was very strong here=2C but now it is = gone. :-)


Lubos=2C OK2BVG

****************************************************
>=3B Date: Fri=2C 24 Jan 2014 21:05:15 +0200
>=3B From: phl@ne= tikka.fi
>=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Subject: Re: = LF: Unknown signal
>=3B
>=3B My wild bet is on RMP / Kaliningrad= Naval Base.
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B Before we moved down to 472...= 479 kHz I kept an ear on the proposed
>=3B band over a year or so. B= ack then RMP made quite regular "RTTY"
>=3B transmissions with cente= r frequency 474.0 kHz. Usually starting
>=3B transmissions in "RTTY-= keyed" CW so the callsign could be copied by
>=3B ear. They vanished= from the QRG before amateur activity started and I
>=3B thought it = might have had something to do with the new allocation.
>=3B
>= =3B I remember this so well because I laughed at all the fears of hams >=3B "jamming" aero-NDB's=2C while this firethrower blasted away spot on= the
>=3B "BIA" carrier.
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B Anyone with= DF-capability that can check if Kaliningrad in on the
>=3B null-bea= ring?
>=3B
>=3B As a curiosity RMP is also sending WX etc. in CW= on 583.0 kHz=2C
>=3B starting 16.00 UTC as far as I have noticed. C= an be copied here on the
>=3B AM car-radio on 585 kHz if there is a = suitable BC-carrier on 585 kHz
>=3B acting as a beat oscillator. (Th= is is how i found them by accident
>=3B years ago)
>=3B
>= =3B
>=3B BR
>=3B
>=3B Paul-Henrik=2C OH1LSQ
>=3B
= >=3B
= --_9fef649c-858c-4e0f-90cb-914b2003040e_--