Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp8890igc; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:49:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.195.12.200 with SMTP id es8mr97836wjd.77.1390909753692; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:49:13 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ll10si7571655wjc.79.2014.01.28.03.49.11 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:49:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W86pD-00066m-On for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:27:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W86pD-00066d-Av for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:27:27 +0000 Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W86pA-0002VJ-TM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:27:26 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id w5so274465qac.3 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:27:23 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mmPF+N3Dl3c2xipHD5zgJ/nC+dvUSQ+BQDd1UwNN8MU=; b=IZ54oTMywqtnTL3DdT3EtYOKXWwhe5tXCqtoyAEb4VW1s+UCcq1k0heNwNffRcOLmP fRSDw0/1BuP5UkpoVl2065pnqrySqNRustcIjsZVup+dfEViRbfrzevnsAX/bNbBNAxy RnMxJ8RvLtpS+r1arwbe69nSjjyWAUEDj6gIMhKJoM5HIvV2rZ2GEuky4LxPyaQ02YJf CkIuAJ027rR8WEa4FWrnTU+HnnDYFVixVBlqxVu/UTV1MIokMl/CdKENqm+A6Zglz38F uMZND7OYYXsHzUha1DJYF+jf9mdktBRV0X0jnA3q3oeTjP7Q7Cav4qYz00beNX940yxD bVPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.28.72 with SMTP id l8mr1444323qac.6.1390908442963; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.245.68 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:27:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:27:22 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Is my reading of the UK frequency allocation chart right? One can operate *without a licenc*e in the old 73kHz band using licence-exempt inductive devices rules as long as the output is less than 72dBuA at 10m? Not sure what sort of ERP this equates to. A few uW I assume? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.216.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: LF: 73kHz in the UK? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1c9a6a8748904f1061bd0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a11c1c9a6a8748904f1061bd0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is my reading of the UK frequency allocation chart right? One can operate *without a licenc*e in the old 73kHz band using licence-exempt inductive devices rules as long as the output is less than 72dBuA at 10m? Not sure what sort of ERP this equates to. A few uW I assume? Perhaps someone can advise/confirm. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm --001a11c1c9a6a8748904f1061bd0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is my reading of th= e UK frequency allocation chart right?

One can operate without a= licence in the old 73kHz band using licence-exempt inductive devices r= ules as long as the output is less than 72dBuA at 10m? Not sure what sort o= f ERP this equates to. A few uW I assume?

Perhaps someone can advise/confirm.

73s
Roger G3X= BM
--001a11c1c9a6a8748904f1061bd0--