Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp159148igc; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:25:53 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.63.134 with SMTP id g6mr10760220wjs.46.1389396352551; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:25:52 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gx5si2221013wib.47.2014.01.10.15.25.52 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W1l7v-0001Aw-65 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:04:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W1l7u-0001An-MT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:04:30 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W1l7t-0001vy-1C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:04:29 +0000 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.237.153.18]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5a9E-1V8o1D48WO-00xbuo for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 00:04:28 +0100 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <52D05D4D.5060002@freenet.de> <9DC76E4645F24A6CAAE1195541679417@Clemens0811> <52D078DE.60903@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <52D078DE.60903@freenet.de> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 00:04:36 +0100 Message-ID: <90759FFE2651486D8D61DFD3F3D64608@Clemens0811> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac8OVrHMujDD0nw0Qt+/XS/M8p2uVgAANjEQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:dEKquqlmZSSyqol7mPKHRRt4Y0xLwZ4UzbKe/KJ4EChI1w0SGoV ZyoKKks/iYbqW3IfTvg0+wWgwsQBnps6lSxdDUAtFENWjA9nlF/Nj6384v58XMawwpk0uHn dyF5MpSRFhGfTyOsupvgM3GXGaS+NtFSWb+Ln2MIt8rHNv2dvUcypPZzIGbskQdCC+TzG5X DVPCdj/aGmdcfcLtKgdow== X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Wolf, >Thanks for QSO very nice, My pleasure. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.227.15.18 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (cpaul[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Subject: RE: LF: RE: DL4RAJ testing? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Wolf, >Thanks for QSO very nice, My pleasure. >and *much* stronger now than during your >initial test. It's the nepers :-) Have to quiet now my SPSP, it raises the RX noise level by about 1,15Np... 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of wolf_dl4yhf >Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 11:49 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: RE: DL4RAJ testing? > >Hi Clemens, > >Thanks for QSO - very nice, and *much* stronger now than during your >initial test. > >GL and have a nice weekend; I just hear Alex 'ULF and Wlli >'SX/p also on >frequency.. > >73, Wolf . > > >Am 10.01.2014 23:17, schrieb Clemens Paul: >> Hi Wolf, >> >> yes, it was me when fine tuning the setup. >> I2BBJ now S9,qsb is decreasing now. >> >> 73 >> Clemens >> DL4RAJ >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of wolf_dl4yhf >>> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 9:51 PM >>> To: RSGB LF Group at blacksheep >>> Subject: LF: DL4RAJ testing? >>> >>> Hi Clemens, >>> >>> hrd your callsign 'loud and clear' around 20:30 (or a bit >>> earlier) on MF .. >>> .. but just a few Nepers :) above local QRM level. Now >I2BBJ on the >>> old frequency. >>> >>> 73, >>> Wolf . >>> >> >> >> > >