Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp62382igc; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:01:50 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.100.70 with SMTP id ew6mr5067736wib.57.1390752109118; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:01:49 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id as2si3859838wjc.137.2014.01.26.08.01.48 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 08:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W7RbH-0006X1-MN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:26:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W7RbH-0006Ws-2f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:26:19 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W7RbF-0000gB-9n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 15:26:17 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s0QFQGtm014586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:26:16 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id s0QFQF4G007465 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:26:16 +0100 Message-ID: <52E52912.6090607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:26:10 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1390748768.77936.YahooMailNeo@web133005.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1390748768.77936.YahooMailNeo@web133005.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Chris, I'm ready for a LF QSO if you like. I'm watching with the grabber as usual on 137.7 kHz in QRSS3 and QRSS10. Guess you won't be strong enough here for a CW QSO but maybe QRSS is possible. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: Re: LF: 136.5 / 137.7 QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040600000500080702020108" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040600000500080702020108 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Chris, I'm ready for a LF QSO if you like. I'm watching with the grabber as usual on 137.7 kHz in QRSS3 and QRSS10. Guess you won't be strong enough here for a CW QSO but maybe QRSS is possible. I'm going to start to call CQ on 137.7 as well, now. Some days ago someone asked for LF activity too, someone from the east. I don't remember the call though. BTW there are some MF CW OPs thinking about x band QSOs LF/MF. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 26.01.2014 16:06, schrieb Chris Osborn: > LF, > > Does anyone fancy an LF QSO this evening - 136.5kHz CW or 137.7 kHz > QRSS / DFCW ? > I've dusted my old TRX off and want to give it an airing. > > I've been calling CQ but guess one needs an appointment for an LF QSO > these days . . > > 73 > > Chris > G3XIZ > > IO 92 UB > --------------040600000500080702020108 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Chris,

I'm ready for a LF QSO if you like. I'm watching with the grabber as usual on 137.7 kHz in QRSS3 and QRSS10.
Guess you won't be strong enough here for a CW QSO but maybe QRSS is possible.

I'm going to start to call CQ on 137.7 as well, now.

Some days ago someone asked for LF activity too, someone from the east. I don't remember the call though.

BTW there are some MF CW OPs thinking about x band QSOs LF/MF.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 26.01.2014 16:06, schrieb Chris Osborn:
LF, 

Does anyone fancy an LF QSO this evening - 136.5kHz CW or 137.7 kHz QRSS / DFCW ?
I've dusted my old TRX off and want to give it an airing.

I've been calling CQ but guess one needs an appointment for an LF QSO these days . .

73

Chris
G3XIZ

IO 92 UB

--------------040600000500080702020108--