Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp398843igc; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:16:54 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.90.144 with SMTP id bw16mr7565170wjb.1.1390501013568; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:16:53 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l7si9491716wjz.113.2014.01.23.10.16.53 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:16:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W6OG8-0000pD-7I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:40:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W6OG7-0000p4-OF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:40:07 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([195.4.92.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W6OG2-0002eE-3w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:40:06 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.140] (helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1W6OG0-00077Q-QR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:40:00 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:59841 helo=mjail0.freenet.de) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1W6OG0-00086m-Lm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:40:00 +0100 Received: from mx14.freenet.de ([195.4.92.24]:35462) by mjail0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1W6ODU-0007fv-MQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:37:24 +0100 Received: from blfd-d9bf1f67.pool.mediaways.net ([217.191.31.103]:4214 helo=[192.168.178.21]) by mx14.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.80.1 #4) id 1W6ODT-0008MT-So for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:37:24 +0100 Message-ID: <52E15352.4090706@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:37:22 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <64b2129ffaea45229a5e93166be96c99@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: X-Originated-At: 217.191.31.103!4214 X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 23.01.2014 17:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: > Testing your .usr file now Uwe. > Testing on 3m wire and ~1 Watt notebook ouput. > RX antenna at 20 m distance. > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb > Setpoint is 8270.010, but signal becomes visible at 8269.465 Hz. > I see that often with SL. > Why ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: Re: LF: Testing 8269.990 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030709030100080409070501" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030709030100080409070501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 23.01.2014 17:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter: > Testing your .usr file now Uwe. > Testing on 3m wire and ~1 Watt notebook ouput. > RX antenna at 20 m distance. > www.qsl.net/pa1sdb > Setpoint is 8270.010, but signal becomes visible at 8269.465 Hz. > I see that often with SL. > Why ? Maybe one of those unfriendly cards (like the beast in my Z71m) where the sampling clock for the DAC is "slightly different" from the ADC's .. if so, try another one .. 73, Wolf . --------------030709030100080409070501 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Am 23.01.2014 17:55, schrieb PA1SDB, Peter:
Testing your .usr file now Uwe.
Testing on 3m wire and ~1 Watt notebook ouput.
RX antenna at 20 m distance.
 
Setpoint is 8270.010, but signal becomes visible at 8269.465 Hz.
I see that often with SL.
Why ?

Maybe one of those unfriendly cards (like the beast in my Z71m) where the sampling clock for the DAC is "slightly different" from the ADC's .. if so, try another one ..

73,
  Wolf .

--------------030709030100080409070501--