Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <52DDB1CC.8000502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:31:24 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <stb7jj8i36ykvnjmhn2w1jb9.1387917789184@email.android.com> <35FE4D7949D24153B93AD287570B1AA6@Clemens0811> <52CDB98E.2090806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <07DCC8F8EED14FA7A932FF8F90ED27A6@Clemens0811> <52CDD7DE.8080807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <34613E4DA8F14D389A2BCF8A04DDF0DA@Clemens0811> <52D1B87C.80005@freenet.de> <E2DE4EC9105C43E0847B31050309F109@Clemens0811> <52D1C679.9070506@freenet.de> <81046BF0DF784FB18751214A2CE7347A@Clemens0811> <52DC4017.2030505@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <F2AAC492D14A4A14B655BD668431D0E7@Clemens0811>
In-Reply-To: <F2AAC492D14A4A14B655BD668431D0E7@Clemens0811>
Subject: Re: LF: MW Antenna [was:RE: Clemens on MF!!]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hi Clemens,

I can see all the solar modules on the neighbours roofs. That may be a 
reason for the QRM (?). I think if you can manage to create an earth 
system in http://no.nonsense.ee/qth/map.html?qth=JN68KJ79XH at the 
current feed point of the antenna and then use a coax cable and an 
isolation transformer or a separate primary winding on the variometer 
coil body then the QRM may be even lower than in the dipole 
configuration :-)

73, Stefan

Am 20.01.2014 21:45, schrieb Clemens Paul:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>    
>> +6 dB, so now you're getting twice the antenna current with
>> the same power?
>>      
> No,only about 10% more (calculated) as the VSWR is a bit better.
> R went from ~60 Ohm to 50 Ohm,reactance being cancelled out.
> The increase in signal strength by 6dB comes from reduced ground losses due
> to vertical polarization as opposed to horizontal polarization in dipole mode.
>
>    
>> Can you show us the image showing your house and the antenna again? I
>>      
> Attached once more for convenience (see also link at the end).
> Red traces = dipole legs (2x155m)
> Yellow trace = open wire feeder (42m)
>
>    
>> remember there was a coax of some 10m between TX and dipole feed point
>>      
> That must be someone different. -:)
> Here the feeder runs directly into the shack,vertical part about 6m.
> So in T-Antenna mode there's quite a bit of top load...
>
> Let's see how I can manage the earth problem.
> I believe for reception I will further stay with the dipole mode because it's extremely
> quiet ( -110dBm or true ~S3 in 200Hz BW) due to careful balancing and its remote
> location from the houses.
> When receiving I can afford up to 10-15dB signal loss on MW without
> degrading SNR.
>
> http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN68KJ79WJ
>
> 73
> Clemens
> DL4RAJ
>