Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Message-ID: <52DCF627.5030909@psk31.plus.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:10:47 +0000
From: g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <c9691802d80d439d8fa4b87fb9a65ca7@kabelmail.de> <7A4CDE1B603646609121E5084A1DB819@White>
In-Reply-To: <7A4CDE1B603646609121E5084A1DB819@White>
Subject: Re: VLF: DJ8WX 8270.004 Hz
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------040509020308020706030505"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040509020308020706030505
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 19/01/2014 12:18, Markus Vester wrote:
> Attached are four stacked spectrograms of Uwe's signal as received by 
> Paul Nicholson, DF6NM, OK2BVG and PA1SDB (top to bottom), scaled to 
> the same time and similar frequency scales. The steps around 2 UT seem 
> to have left a gap at OK2BVG and DF6NM. In a direct mail, Paul has 
> sent a series of phase measurements in half hour intervals, which seem 
> to corroberate the assumption of a phase step sometime around 2 UT.
> The improvements of Uwe's signal at PA1SDB over the years is indeed 
> impressive. Uwe, can you perhaps comment on your antenna size and 
> current, then and now?

Hi Markus

I was just up and running to catch the (cats) tail end of Uwe's 
transmission I look forward to the next excursions.

Re the improvement over the years in Uwe's signal. Here I have not seen 
signals recently as good as those in the past I am sure, I will look up 
my captures.
Secondly I think I saw an improvement when the QRG moved to 8270Hz. Of 
course this is a very tenuous observation, just a gut feeling but often 
those are highly reliable indicators of fields for investigation.

73 Eddie


--------------040509020308020706030505
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    On 19/01/2014 12:18, Markus Vester wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:7A4CDE1B603646609121E5084A1DB819@White"
      type="cite">
      <div><font face="Arial" size="2">Attached are four stacked
          spectrograms of Uwe's signal as received by Paul Nicholson,
          DF6NM, OK2BVG and PA1SDB (top to bottom), scaled to the same
          time and similar frequency scales. The steps around 2 UT seem
          to have left a gap at OK2BVG and DF6NM. In a direct mail, Paul
          has sent a series of phase measurements in half hour
          intervals, which seem to corroberate the assumption of a phase
          step sometime around 2 UT.</font></div>
      <div> </div>
      <div><font face="Arial" size="2">The improvements of Uwe's signal
          at PA1SDB over the years is indeed impressive. Uwe, can you
          perhaps comment on your antenna size and current, then and
          now?</font></div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Hi Markus<br>
    <br>
    I was just up and running to catch the (cats) tail end of Uwe's
    transmission I look forward to the next excursions.<br>
    <br>
    Re the improvement over the years in Uwe's signal. Here I have not
    seen signals recently as good as those in the past I am sure, I will
    look up my captures.<br>
    Secondly I think I saw an improvement when the QRG moved to 8270Hz.
    Of course this is a very tenuous observation, just a gut feeling but
    often those are highly reliable indicators of fields for
    investigation.<br>
    <br>
    73 Eddie<br>
     <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------040509020308020706030505--