Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp44179igc; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 08:59:19 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.187.36 with SMTP id fp4mr26580295wic.9.1389286759216; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:59:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d7si4855006wix.78.2014.01.09.08.59.18 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 08:59:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W1Iaj-0001Kg-Jt for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:36:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W1Iaj-0001KX-0k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:36:21 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W1Iag-0003We-Nk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:36:19 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s09GaHmN005354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:36:17 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id s09GaHj9024063 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:36:17 +0100 Message-ID: <52CECFFC.8080108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:36:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52CDB8D3.4020304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1389270976.90572.YahooMailNeo@web140104.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <52CEB1F3.9010507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <008a01cf0d4b$1e0758e0$5a160aa0$@de> <52CEBF22.2020504@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <00aa01cf0d54$e9a43320$bcec9960$@de> In-Reply-To: <00aa01cf0d54$e9a43320$bcec9960$@de> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe, Am 09.01.2014 17:07, schrieb Joe: > Strong wind from the west or southwest squeeze the 3 wires of the > Top-C and let them jump or dance :o) wich causes a change in the > antenna impedance. Z is jumping around 20 -- 80 Ohms. But it is the magnitude of Z, actually the imaginary part, or the reactance, or the C :-) You could build an automatic variometer which compensates this changing C. My antenna is also changing its reactive component but it is no problem. Ever thought about building an automatic variometer? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 18c0ce4cbca80559a8b22b14cd653174 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 tonite Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050506040408020407000407" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050506040408020407000407 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Joe, Am 09.01.2014 17:07, schrieb Joe: > Strong wind from the west or southwest squeeze the 3 wires of the > Top-C and let them jump or dance :o) wich causes a change in the > antenna impedance. Z is jumping around 20 -- 80 Ohms. But it is the magnitude of Z, actually the imaginary part, or the reactance, or the C :-) You could build an automatic variometer which compensates this changing C. My antenna is also changing its reactive component but it is no problem. Ever thought about building an automatic variometer? > Another point ist he earth conductivity which change extremely when it > geting wet. > > I tuned my antenna last night before starting my transmission. I > allways do this with an miniVNA, which works perfect. > > It was tuned to 137.600kHz, this morning after the rain, it was tuned > to 144,900kHz! Due to the small BW it makes no sense to transmit under > such conditions. > Yes, but if the resonance changes, it does not mean that the earth conductivity changed extremely. Let's assume your earth loss is 60 Ohm, then it may change to 50 or 70 Ohm but not to 10 or 200 Ohm... You can see the changing earth losses by this test: Dry: P=100W, coil losses = 20 Ohm, antena resonated to 137 kHz. I= 1A => Earth losses ~ 80 Ohm. Wet: (retune the antenna to 137 kHz by reducing the inductivity) P=90W, coil losses still 20 Ohm, now 0.9A => Earth losses ~ 90 Ohm. Oh, this leads me to the question how you're matching your antenna to the transmitter. Is it by a variometer and a ferrite transformer in series to the cold end of the coil, like i do, or is it maybe with a LC network or a tapped coil or so? I assume that your overall resistance (the R of that Z=R+jX) does vary by less than 20% which would be OK for the PA, as long as the X component is permanently compensated. 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------050506040408020407000407 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Joe,

Am 09.01.2014 17:07, schrieb Joe:
Strong wind from the west or southwest squeeze the 3 wires of the Top-C and let them jump or dance :o) wich causes a change in the antenna impedance. Z is jumping around 20 – 80 Ohms.
But it is the magnitude of Z, actually the imaginary part, or the reactance, or the C :-) You could build an automatic variometer which compensates this changing C.
My antenna is also changing its reactive component but it is no problem.
Ever thought about building an automatic variometer?

Another point ist he earth conductivity which change extremely when it geting wet.

I tuned my antenna last night before starting my transmission. I allways do this with an miniVNA, which works perfect.

It was tuned to 137.600kHz, this morning after the rain, it was tuned to 144,900kHz! Due to the small BW it makes no sense to transmit under such conditions.

Yes, but if the resonance changes, it does not mean that the earth conductivity changed extremely.
Let's assume your earth loss is 60 Ohm, then it may change to 50 or 70 Ohm but not to 10 or 200 Ohm...

You can see the changing earth losses by this test:

Dry: P=100W, coil losses = 20 Ohm, antena resonated to 137 kHz. I= 1A  => Earth losses ~ 80 Ohm.
Wet: (retune the antenna to 137 kHz by reducing the inductivity) P=90W, coil losses still 20 Ohm, now 0.9A => Earth losses ~ 90 Ohm.

Oh, this leads me to the question how you're matching your antenna to the transmitter. Is it by a variometer and a ferrite transformer in series to the cold end of the coil, like i do, or is it maybe with a LC network or a tapped coil or so?

I assume that your overall resistance (the R of that Z=R+jX) does vary by less than 20% which would be OK for the PA, as long as the X component is permanently compensated.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


--------------050506040408020407000407--