Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp236460igc; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:55:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.42.134 with SMTP id o6mr27896281igl.18.1389120925372; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:55:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from mailman.qth.net (mailman.qth.net. [69.16.227.189]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s10si101482008icv.21.2014.01.07.10.55.25 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:55:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of lowfer-bounces@mailman.qth.net designates 69.16.227.189 as permitted sender) client-ip=69.16.227.189; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of lowfer-bounces@mailman.qth.net designates 69.16.227.189 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=lowfer-bounces@mailman.qth.net; dkim=neutral (bad format) header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from harry.qsl.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248F1149A58F; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:55:17 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: lowfer@mailman.qth.net Delivered-To: lowfer@mailman.qth.net Received: from delivery.antispamcloud.com (delivery.antispamcloud.com [95.211.233.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3822149A567 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:55:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-yh0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43]) by mx5.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1W0bnz-0000n5-MO for lowfer@mailman.qth.net; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:55:15 +0100 Received: by mail-yh0-f43.google.com with SMTP id a41so102465yho.16 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:55:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xerp+w59wLKI0GZEpxZmyuG2nzK2msB1Jtqd3XafjcE=; b=07lHIK9jgATIvLq79fU+T8X8c7Moolfl+ETs3/EMba+hXYQPw7Srk2Z42jvi3YKTQA /AACOf57wq5w1VTCTn60v3GjEcgFEMzIoJODpOLfZwUk/vOyb65c4RaKEJRkJXVjpXeZ waG6xQlJ4BK7J+qtBTReUi8MV7crKHyHp+vZ1SRpqRIvOjAUO0sqTpR+S2jOl4uy0yJx 28NscmoHzkgB4DEM+nQHt50qmOuugfKzcm5kCR5Co4znJxFtRA7xNGo6VotcwKXuFEFE kuhYxRQBD/u2xobZ4g0ymEPjV4VOg+gkW0IwudjOfrE+sbnswqW0Icy1yRDo9BVkEoAH o6gg== X-Received: by 10.236.106.99 with SMTP id l63mr3769124yhg.81.1389120908238; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:55:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (h111.158.82.166.dynamic.ip.windstream.net. [166.82.158.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm25233953yhe.21.2014.01.07.10.55.07 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:55:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52CC4D86.1090504@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 13:55:02 -0500 From: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX User-Agent: Messenger 9.0a1 (Windows/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, & UK) and MedFer bands" References: <52CBDE7D.17823.4AA0EB@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass (mx5.antispamcloud.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.43; envelope-from=dexter.mc@gmail.com; helo=mail-yh0-f43.google.com; X-SPF-Result: mx5.antispamcloud.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender X-Filter-ID: XtLePq6GTMn8G68F0EmQvYN8MB9EUMvkXW2LZS9uQYS/plcKjpxDTjgFjJjpYH/CERWeKKG4PAQY Nyavp7c49HOKk+Fcfzlnd/fKREqH4PqZ4msf3awoY2e3ilVXGiSQx9joL2+OqsYVPu9ZnUXqvU63 m9mqAMWaWs2+mUwysbafX8o+1a8wdYpMB12CJ6uzQmJ4HlRCsH1PU/sDtC3nMYHEo/8zRI52oJ13 8B15M+40esa2xBhMAfM2us00QppK1odBOuwoSvrOcoOj3owfWfSkJvcj/FqKCG/AQHjy0ag2d2tT 50EjGXUHRwJMtMdn647lNwN4qOsSZg+fYhVZG5c0uOFBZIGNcgvlM7QqmJLruu6SbdbSMTBcp+1Q UqcL5P2oEr7YLXtswl1tSZcF5yB8fSbLCu6TmzCwbzQ9nQhVE9vQ7I9ut1cSSJLGAVu3ruqHGgvA jOoiIEZGNBFoYlkwRqnSbdH+U/EGz5xYD+qkJKdZvY0NVC/VuKC2Rv6V87XPDwXshuGpqKN6n1/y fghdQtVqV09thE8ap2HZVQk= Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dexter.mc@gmail.com Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; dkim=pass header.i=gmail.com X-Spampanel-Class: ham X-Spampanel-Evidence: Combined (5.86) X-Recommended-Action: accept Subject: Re: [Lowfer] LF: XRS4 and 5 last night X-BeenThere: lowfer@mailman.qth.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: dexter.mc@gmail.com, "Discussion of the Lowfer \(US, European, & UK\) and MedFer bands" List-Id: "Discussion of the Lowfer \(US, European, & UK\) and MedFer bands" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: lowfer-bounces@mailman.qth.net Errors-To: lowfer-bounces@mailman.qth.net Bob Raide wrote: > Mike; > First, thanks for great captures of Dex and me. A look at Hartmut's > grabber showed my signal weak or just identifiable with only a couple > solid times. Same with Markus's grabber. Dex is south of me by at > least 300 KM and it is amazing to see his signal over 7000 KM as solid > as a rock! I don't think it would have been that good on 137-but we > will never know only over an average of more runs. > "One for the propagation experts" is an understatement, indeed. The antenna here was perfectly tuned at mid day when the high temperature was about 42F. The cold front arrived with high winds and the temperature fell quickly reaching a low of 7F by sunrise. This morning I found the antenna impedance had changed greatly producing a nasty pattern on the scope match traces. To get the antenna impedance back to where it was at midday yesterday I had to remove two makeshift windings from the matching transformer I was using. I'm using the same matching transformer on 74 kHz that I use on 137 kHz. On 74 kHz last fall it took two more turns through the cores than I've ever needed for 137 kHz. So I just made a few more passes through the cores with the loading coil feed wire. The freezing weather probably has improved my signal on 74 kHz but the day before the freeze Hartmut received XRS5 much stronger than last fall. I suspect this is because the oak trees are now bare. I like my trees but it sure would be nice to have an open space under the LF antenna top hat wires. Here's a picture of the trees with leaves under the top hat wires: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15095569/w4dex/LF/trees_under_tophat_summer.jpg And a picture just now made: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15095569/w4dex/LF/trees_under_tophat_winter.jpg The top hat wires run over the trees with one connecting to a tower at the right side of the metal building on the right. Another top hat wire runs over the trees to a tower located on the right side of the small brown building. The ends of the two top hat wire connect together going over more trees. Dex ______________________________________________________________ Lowfer mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Lowfer@mailman.qth.net Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment! This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html