Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp23359igc; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:18:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.8.229 with SMTP id u5mr166131wja.80.1390922310941; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:18:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cl9si8759226wib.5.2014.01.28.07.18.30 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:18:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@yahoo.co.uk Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W8AGN-0008Uh-VQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:07:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W8AGN-0008UU-Dk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:07:43 +0000 Received: from nm25-vm6.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.97.39]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W8AGK-000422-Vw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:07:42 +0000 Received: from [212.82.98.60] by nm25.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 -0000 Received: from [212.82.98.105] by tm13.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1042.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 -0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=yahoo.co.uk Result=Good and Known Domain X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 364127.10973.bm@omp1042.mail.ir2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 43026 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1390921659; bh=BlGe6LMNOiCc2OqJxCjAU3Uo61GC5WHNr4WF6BZl2+c=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AYptPv8kf3ckP84kOnSDMEJibLGxSXUwBBVjelhHGyPhGqk7PK7EY/iqvGAOY1kQCYPtLoxC1ofbsjQezc8/K8qMQlk2TAyTOsWJ+612ZzTRQDXxUhHszsZ8lIc7cpvRioco3eSQxAucPOzomAX6i5YXL8deHf1kH1QWmCqXJik= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YKn0xFnHayV2jZEUy1LJEUtElsHGTiLOOhhhQ7Dp368pwNIjY+sExQHXxXM+MnJqsvLO+vk+/yLrf6zA+qIbR82HKvequT/FggsEh7lamQynyMWbefLsdXuyXcKaWiuPuP5hI1z5BwGg8XntM1R6rnUw6UQDFjpfOp8S+Mo5TMo=; X-YMail-OSG: fX.cvRYVM1liNEhon3b7ldZztRtmNe7JXtLRJRQZL6dJ5LI lzbpyF6uPDTPpCOqyuSeYCyCfvTRoYWuRpm_PmJxGKCnghZvvjL3H1DfOGAM jvVkihMzF7gufkNCmQv9H69r8rQBJjVpu2fAKn7Lp._PIZRz8lYMqdFUHJNd .LshjX7OOF_f_nxhn92kuy2qwQUgb28ulGNeuYpylt_vGTBOblHFP5rK6d0C GhI.ZEDGC3wJsaSqqkpz2TK.lAUGmQKYWLwpwgpKluypv0h8_asI_5eBETkE 2RlbpGp5sHa16hzsOd5gu1GN7fVGLogmABIFY5hUCPqzZuvD5CgfFLhA6MYy sPsGUfIDf6brcFGYHZ_usGguqVg5OOF6Q2tYUNjsN4d2IMgi5oaZTlOamfXG z.9F9rATpJa2bOSn8E4jTvuVo0pq7NFYJL1_AEcNsXM.cuzzx.CmwIKd1O0y 5SzxZgz_Jyl6H92rj9wL3FUB37FRrX5.RdWn3OsbiknAi.JWJFe_nqphJK4f m2xD.7Y5TBNC2Pby2grUlf6M8sQjLz7wyzRxlmPTgSGfZiI5k Received: from [77.102.18.13] by web171401.mail.ir2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 GMT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,SnVzdCB1c2UgaXQgYW5kIGV4cGVyaW1lbnQhwqAtaXQgaXMgb2sgYXPCoHRob3NlIGxvdyBmcmVxdWVuY2llc8KgYXJlIG9mIG5vIGludGVyZXN0IHRvIHRoZSBjb21tZXJjaWFsIHdvcmxkLCBEYXZlCgogCgpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXwogRnJvbTogZzN6am8gPGczempvQHBzazMxLnBsdXMuY29tPgpUbzogcnNnYl9sZl9ncm91cEBibGFja3NoZWVwLm9yZyAKU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgMjggSmFudWFyeSAyMDE0LCAxNDo1MgpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogTEY6IEJlbG93IDguM2tIeiABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.174.629 References: <52E7C438.7050205@psk31.plus.com> Message-ID: <1390921659.65124.YahooMailNeo@web171401.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:07:39 +0000 (GMT) From: David Hine To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" In-Reply-To: <52E7C438.7050205@psk31.plus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Just use it and experiment! -it is ok as those low frequencies are of no interest to the commercial world, Dave From: g3zjo To: Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:52 Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.97.39 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (evad_hine[at]yahoo.co.uk) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fb3e28a759dea7e01d34d3fe7de7ae98 Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-491639913-437705947-1390921659=:65124" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false ---491639913-437705947-1390921659=:65124 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just use it and experiment!=A0-it is ok as=A0those low frequencies=A0are of= no interest to the commercial world, Dave=0A=0A =0A=0A____________________= ____________=0A From: g3zjo =0ATo: rsgb_lf_group@blac= ksheep.org =0ASent: Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:52=0ASubject: Re: LF: Belo= w 8.3kHz in the UK freuency allocations=0A =0A=0A=0AHi Roger=0A=0AOn 28/01= /2014 14:06, Roger Lapthorn wrote: =0A=0A>=0AQuoting from the entry in the = published UK frequency allocations table:=0A>=0A>=0A>"Bands below 8.3 kHz a= re not allocated within the United =0A>Kingdom"=0A> =0A> =0A>In the UK I t= ake this to mean ANYONE can operate below 8.3kHz without licence or NoV per= mits being needed, assuming no interference to services above 8.3kHz.=0A>= =0A> =0AIts odd isn't it, a case of how you read it. There have been thoug= hts stated elsewhere recently,=A0 personally I don't think it means.=0ABand= s below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom, so=0A it is= a free for all.=0A=0AIt could be.=0ABands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated = within the United Kingdom, and=0A so are not protected from interference= .=0AOr=0ABands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom an= d=0A never will be.=0AOr=0ABands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within = the United Kingdom and=0A must be kept clear at all times.=0AOr=0ABands = below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United Kingdom as=0A they are= receive only and used for research.=0A=0AMore words are needed for clarity= , maybe its not specified in order=0A to do keep control of what goes on= there, the total opposite of a=0A free for all.=0A=0A73 Eddie ---491639913-437705947-1390921659=:65124 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just use it and experiment! -it is ok as = ;those low frequencies are of no interest to the commercial world, Dav= e

From: g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plu= s.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Se= nt: Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 14:52
Subject: Re: LF: Below 8.3kHz in the UK freuency a= llocations

=0A =0A=0A =0A =0A
=0A Hi Roger
=0A =0A On 28/01/2014 14:06, Roger Lapthorn wrote:=0A
=0A
=0A
=0A

=0A
=0A Quoting from the entry in the = published UK frequency=0A allocations table:
=0A
= =0A
"Bands=0A below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within t= he United
=0A
Kingdom"
= =0A
=0A
=0A
=0A
In the= UK I take this to mean ANYONE can operate below=0A 8.3kHz without= licence or NoV permits being needed, assuming=0A no interference = to services above 8.3kHz.
=0A
=0A
=0A =0A
=0A Its odd isn't it, a case of how you read it. = There have been=0A thoughts stated elsewhere recently,  personally = I don't think it=0A means.
=0A Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocat= ed within the United Kingdom, so=0A it is a free for all.
=0A
= =0A It could be.
=0A Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within = the United Kingdom, and=0A so are not protected from interference.
= =0A Or
=0A Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated within the United= Kingdom and=0A never will be.
=0A Or
=0A Bands below 8.3 kH= z are not allocated within the United Kingdom and=0A must be kept clear = at all times.
=0A Or
=0A Bands below 8.3 kHz are not allocated = within the United Kingdom as=0A they are receive only and used for resea= rch.
=0A
=0A More words are needed for clarity, maybe its not = specified in order=0A to do keep control of what goes on there, the tota= l opposite of a=0A free for all.
=0A
=0A 73 Eddie
=0A =
=0A
=0A=0A


---491639913-437705947-1390921659=:65124--