Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25;
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 22:52:37 +0100
From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Message-ID: <ceb5abb6f06948a78f6df8b5e016e0ed@kabelmail.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Re: VLF: 8969.99
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----81F5A8D428184272A6F4B7C0EF642F4C"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

------81F5A8D428184272A6F4B7C0EF642F4C
Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Stefan and Eddy,

 thanks for the reports=2E the equipment here is the same as ever (500W=
 output into 300m aerial wire)=2E
 Markus asked for some OPERA OP4H tests=2E We have to schedule that tes=
t=2E GL=20

Uwe/dj8wx as Tom dj8CAT=2E=20
  Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
 Gesendet: 26=2E12=2E2013 13:55
 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
 Betreff: Re: VLF: 8969=2E99

 Hi Uwe, Tom, VLF,

 Best signal ever from Tom, capture attached=2E Is it due to the propag=
ation or did it improve your signal?
 What about some tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there i=
s permanent rain here so i have to wait some days longer=2E

 73, Stefan/DK7FC

 Am 26=2E12=2E2013 10:58, schrieb g3zjo:   Hi All

 Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8=2E9KHz with less catastrophic noise pu=
lses=2E This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong than duri=
ng other tests I was in the catchment area=2E The low signal level mean=
s there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and 47uHz FFT but I w=
as able to catch some nice periods when the signal in 47uHz was10dB abo=
ve the noise peaks=2E I can categorically confirm reception=2E

 Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8CAT) for the signal=2E

 73 Eddie G3ZJO
 http://www=2Eg3zjo=2Etalktalk=2Enet/vlfgrabber=2Ehtm
------81F5A8D428184272A6F4B7C0EF642F4C
Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div style=3D"margin: 5px;padding:0;font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px=
;"><p><span>Hi Stefan and Eddy,<br />
<br />
thanks for the reports=2E the equipment here is the same as ever (500W =
output into 300m aerial wire)=2E<br />
Markus asked for some OPERA OP4H tests=2E We have to schedule that test=
=2E</span></p>
<span></span><span>GL</span>
<p><span>Uwe/dj8wx as Tom dj8CAT=2E</span></p>
<br />
<hr />
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg<br />
Gesendet: 26=2E12=2E2013 13:55<br />
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg<br />
Betreff: Re: VLF: 8969=2E99<br />
<hr />
<br />
Hi Uwe, Tom, VLF,<br />
<br />
Best signal ever from Tom, capture attached=2E Is it due to the
propagation or did it improve your signal?<br />
What about some tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there is
permanent rain here so i have to wait some days longer=2E<br />
<br />
73, Stefan/DK7FC<br />
<br />
Am 26=2E12=2E2013 10:58, schrieb g3zjo:
<blockquote type=3D"cite" cite=3D"mid:52BBFDC4=2E3010507@psk31=2Eplus=2E=
com">
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindo=
ws-1252" />
Hi All<br />
<br />
Yes, yesterday was quieter on 8=2E9KHz with less <strong>cat</strong>as=
trophic
noise pulses=2E This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong
than during other tests I was in the <strong>cat</strong>chment area=2E=
 The low
signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and
47uHz FFT but I was able to <strong>cat</strong>ch some nice periods wh=
en the
signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks=2E I can <strong>cat</str=
ong>egorically
confirm reception=2E<br />
<br />
Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8<strong>CAT</strong>) for the signal=2E<br />
<br />
73 Eddie G3ZJO<br />
<a href=3D"http://www=2Eg3zjo=2Etalktalk=2Enet/vlfgrabber=2Ehtm" class=3D=
"moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send=3D"true">http://www=2Eg3zjo=2Et=
alktalk=2Enet/vlfgrabber=2Ehtm</a><br />
</blockquote></div>
------81F5A8D428184272A6F4B7C0EF642F4C--