Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp54914igc; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:01:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.212.98 with SMTP id nj2mr10474253wic.52.1387137694476; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:01:34 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bf10si3893458wjc.69.2013.12.15.12.01.33 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 12:01:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VsHMB-0003Os-NR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:28:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VsHMB-0003Oj-3r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:28:03 +0000 Received: from dub0-omc1-s12.dub0.hotmail.com ([157.55.0.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VsHM9-0007mT-4L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:28:02 +0000 Received: from DUB114-W81 ([157.55.0.239]) by dub0-omc1-s12.dub0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 15 Dec 2013 11:27:57 -0800 X-TMN: [eVlmPU+6m95AMvFMMUkPXod13cyXaeuh] X-Originating-Email: [bvgbob@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Lubos To: _RSGB_LF Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 20:27:58 +0100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <52ADF944.4010907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <52ACA468.8070907@gmx.de> <00a101cef8fe$a1854350$6402a8c0@pa3fnyb8313412> <52ACB684.4040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52AD2C90.4070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<52ADD9C8.2000700@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52ADF903.2040705@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>,<52ADF944.4010907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2013 19:27:57.0864 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2967280:01CEF9CB] X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan!Thanks for your positive assessment of my new VLF set on the Apollo grabber. As you know, I changed my VLF receiver during the holidays. This one is the "second generation" of my grabber :-) GL and 73! Lubos, OK2BVG [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [157.55.0.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (bvgbob[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 52d17ee6003fa6763aae891a69410baf Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_ebdc3770-dfee-41e2-a55e-dd14347c6a56_" Subject: RE: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1470 --_ebdc3770-dfee-41e2-a55e-dd14347c6a56_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Stefan!Thanks for your positive assessment of my new VLF set on the A= pollo grabber. As you know=2C I changed my VLF receiver during the holidays= . This one is the "second generation" of my grabber :-) GL and 73! Lubos=2C OK2BVG ***************************************************************************= ****************************************************** Date: Sun=2C 15 Dec 2013 19:47:32 +0100 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=3B paul@abelian.netcom.co.uk Subject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= PS: The signal is on air without interruptions since 18:17 UTC. I will=0A= run it until about 22 UTC. =0A= =0A= Am 15.12.2013 19:46=2C schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=0A= =0A= =0A= Hi Bob=2C VLF=2C =0A= =20 =0A= Am 15.12.2013 18:50=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A= =0A= =0A= Stefan=3B =0A= I know your busy but are you using your house ant [30 meter vertical]=0A= for such results on8.9 kHz?? Your already DXing like with the kite=0A= ant!!!=0A= =0A= Yes=2C it is the 30m INV-L. I am about 20 dB weaker compared to the 300m=0A= vertical experiments in 2010. =0A= =20 =0A= Thanks to OK2BVG for the DFCW-600 screenshot! Lubos=2C your grabber is=0A= certainly the best one=2C together with Paul's! =0A= =20 =0A= I think i found the major problem which caused the instability of my=0A= transmit signal. The active VLF antenna was connected to the RX=2C which=0A= overloaded the input. Somehow the 10 kHz reference signal which is=0A= injected by a 100pF C into the signal was swamped by the rubbish coming=0A= from the overloaded RX. Thus i lost the track to my ref signal and the=0A= sample rate detector didn't work properly. Now since the antenna is=0A= disconnected (my signal is still visible=2C due to crosstalk) and the ref= =0A= signal has a nice S/N. Obviously the transmit signal is stable now. I=0A= will run it for another few hours=2C again on 8970.00500 Hz. The last=0A= experiment is a long time ago and i just forget about that problem. =0A= =20 =0A= The next experiment will be soon and i'm doing a few improvements in=0A= the next days. =0A= =20 =0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC =0A= =20 =0A= = --_ebdc3770-dfee-41e2-a55e-dd14347c6a56_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Stefan!
Thanks f= or your positive assessment of my new VLF set on the Apollo grabber. As you= know=2C I changed my VLF receiver during the holidays. This one is the "se= cond generation" of my grabber :-)

GL and 73!
=
Lubos=2C OK2BVG

*******************= ***************************************************************************= ***********************************


Dat= e: Sun=2C 15 Dec 2013 19:47:32 +0100
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heide= lberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=3B paul@abelian.netcom.co.ukSubject: Re: LF: A short VLF experiment at DK7FC

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= PS: The signal is on air without interruptions since 18:17 UTC. I will=0A= run it until about 22 UTC.
=0A=
=0A= Am 15.12.2013 19:46=2C schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=0A=
=0A= =0A= Hi Bob=2C VLF=2C
=0A=
=0A= Am 15.12.2013 18:50=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A=
=0A= =0A=
Stefan=3B
=0A= I know your busy but are you using your house ant [30 meter vertical]=0A= for such results on8.9 kHz?? =3B Your already =3BDXing like with th= e kite=0A= ant!!!
=0A=
=0A= Yes=2C it is the 30m INV-L. I am about 20 dB weaker compared to the 300m=0A= vertical experiments in 2010.
=0A=
=0A= Thanks to OK2BVG for the DFCW-600 screenshot! Lubos=2C your grabber is=0A= certainly the best one=2C together with Paul's!
=0A=
=0A= I think i found the major problem which caused the instability of my=0A= transmit signal. The active VLF antenna was connected to the RX=2C which=0A= overloaded the input. Somehow the 10 kHz reference signal which is=0A= injected by a 100pF C into the signal was swamped by the rubbish coming=0A= from the overloaded RX. Thus i lost the track to my ref signal and the=0A= sample rate detector didn't work properly. Now since the antenna is=0A= disconnected (my signal is still visible=2C due to crosstalk) and the ref= =0A= signal has a nice S/N. Obviously the transmit signal is stable now. I=0A= will run it for another few hours=2C again on 8970.00500 Hz. The last=0A= experiment is a long time ago and i just forget about that problem.
=0A=
=0A= The next experiment will be soon and i'm doing a few improvements in=0A= the next days.
=0A=
=0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
=0A=
=0A=
= --_ebdc3770-dfee-41e2-a55e-dd14347c6a56_--