Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp687637igc; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:40:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.160.166 with SMTP id xl6mr37666831wib.43.1388248835377; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:40:35 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x6si14666716wib.85.2013.12.28.08.40.34 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VwwiX-0005Sx-Md for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:26:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VwwiX-0005So-93 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:26:25 +0000 Received: from mail-qe0-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VwwiV-0007ED-Kn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 16:26:24 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ne12so10152560qeb.39 for ; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:26:21 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PXm+8d6xvJ9l6rkZx5Zo9atJAlfLFu1R7mSpj15v4qs=; b=ezFm34RImV9srSP1xCrnijpJP7RwtfXjiRSIp+7AiW5BkDdejbYudXv8PhqdXS7Ale ZdCa63O6kxnDleMftc0b68ua1avM2BwYw7Rf61GTLmCVKGt3c730otsa9j729eeBFrK2 LoQeVAUYE2NztGGiyIqW0Y72AMjwNaAOFghnb1RWdYnP4B91pbW6HNwTu0PcgTT/m+Sq v0344ERfvoozudAxu58bzOq+hTdy7kiMOsvKjJpjJVNxC9Vx7eRgkchsqzpsoTsi6Y6k 0rvuDTYMoEKGurTq4N80FNjuwiRwkYYhj08+x2Yxw0UNLYQhLhB+YGWXJbdE6iNI3Bnf GhVw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.43.72 with SMTP id v8mr89664882qae.52.1388247981416; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:26:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.184.33 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 08:26:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 11:26:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Warren Ziegler To: rsgb_lf_group X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello the list, I have been searching for an article posted a few years ago concerning receiving loops with a title like "Calibrating Receiving Loops Using DFC77" - as I recall the main thrust of the article is that there is an asymptotic limit to the sensitivity of ferriite loops as you increase the size, and that limit is soon reached. Can anyone point me to a copy? (Searching for the article is what prompted me to check the Yahoo group). [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.128.52 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (wd2xgj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: LF: Loop Antenna Article Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc9f70cae9db04ee9aabf4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 540 --047d7bdc9f70cae9db04ee9aabf4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello the list, I have been searching for an article posted a few years ago concerning receiving loops with a title like "Calibrating Receiving Loops Using DFC77" - as I recall the main thrust of the article is that there is an asymptotic limit to the sensitivity of ferriite loops as you increase the size, and that limit is soon reached. Can anyone point me to a copy? (Searching for the article is what prompted me to check the Yahoo group). Many thanks & HNY -- 73 Warren K2ORS WD2XGJ WD2XSH/23 WE2XEB/2 WE2XGR/1 WG2XRS/1 --047d7bdc9f70cae9db04ee9aabf4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello the list,

=A0 =A0 I have been sea= rching for an article posted a few years ago concerning receiving loops wit= h a title like "Calibrating Receiving Loops Using DFC77" - as I r= ecall the main thrust of the article is that there is an asymptotic limit t= o the sensitivity of ferriite loops as you increase the size, and that limi= t is soon reached. =A0Can anyone point me to a copy?=A0
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 (Searching for the article is what prompted me to chec= k the Yahoo group).

Many thanks & HNY

--
73 Warren K2ORS
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= WE2XGR/1
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WG2XRS/1

=A0
--047d7bdc9f70cae9db04ee9aabf4--