Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp38464igc; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:37:28 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.178.166 with SMTP id cz6mr2277891wjc.53.1387471047577; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:37:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ei2si2462514wib.70.2013.12.19.08.37.26 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:37:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vtg2i-0001fZ-DO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:01:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vtg2h-0001fQ-Ue for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:01:43 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s22.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.33]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtg2g-0007eg-6z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:01:42 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W63 ([65.55.116.8]) by blu0-omc1-s22.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:01:40 -0800 X-TMN: [KagFYqocaV+e6cOzqTeeSiZgrTZ9ousG] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:01:39 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <003901cefcb5$550368d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> References: <003901cefcb5$550368d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Dec 2013 16:01:40.0633 (UTC) FILETIME=[9AD5E090:01CEFCD3] X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Jay, et all; I think if the "average Joe" on 500 would go through the trouble of adding "Deep Search" to any of the OPERA modes, lower power beyond that required by WSPR would be possible for similar decoding. Another plus would be not having to limit numbers of transmissions per hour because of the less likely RX overloading. But the "average Joe" isn't gonna go through the trouble of adding "DS" to OPERA, I would assume? Bob [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.33 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: b1e5ebccbad86c8ca1fd46d24f0285de Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_8716ac33-8d80-4f93-80a2-0db74e4bff49_" Subject: RE: LF: WSPR2 coast-to-coast X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1723 --_8716ac33-8d80-4f93-80a2-0db74e4bff49_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jay=2C et all=3B I think if the "average Joe" on 500 would go through the trouble of adding = "Deep Search" to any of the OPERA modes=2C lower power beyond that required= by WSPR would be possible for similar decoding. Another plus would be not= having to limit numbers of transmissions per hour because of the less like= ly RX overloading. But the "average Joe" isn't gonna go through the troubl= e of adding "DS" to OPERA=2C I would assume? Bob =20 > From: jrusgrove@comcast.net > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Date: Thu=2C 19 Dec 2013 07:24:58 -0500 > Subject: LF: WSPR2 coast-to-coast >=20 > G >=20 > There were 31 WSPR2 'coast-to-coast' (west coast US and EU simultaneous r= eceptions) on 475 kHz last=20 > night from WE2XGR/2 alone ... WE2XGR/2 > K7IUV and WE2XGR/2 > G3XKR. Appa= rently WSPR2 wins the=20 > 'coast-to-coast' competition on 475 kHz ... especially so when one consid= ers WSPR2 is a two minute=20 > cycle time and OP's best time is 4 minutes. >=20 > And ... this was done with moderate transmit power. >=20 > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2=20 >=20 >=20 = --_8716ac33-8d80-4f93-80a2-0db74e4bff49_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Jay=2C et all=3B
I think if t= he "average Joe" on 500 would go through the trouble of adding "Deep Search= " =3Bto any of the OPERA modes=2C =3Blower power beyond that requir= ed by WSPR would be possible for similar decoding. =3B Another plus wou= ld be not having to limit numbers of transmissions per hour because of the = less likely =3BRX overloading.  =3BBut the "average Joe" isn't gonn= a go through the trouble of adding =3B"DS" to OPERA=2C I would assume? = Bob
 =3B
>=3B From: jrusgrove@comcast.net
>=3B To: rs= gb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Date: Thu=2C 19 Dec 2013 07:24:58 -050= 0
>=3B Subject: LF: WSPR2 coast-to-coast
>=3B
>=3B G
>= =3B
>=3B There were 31 WSPR2 'coast-to-coast' (west coast US and EU s= imultaneous receptions) on 475 kHz last
>=3B night from WE2XGR/2 alon= e ... WE2XGR/2 >=3B K7IUV and WE2XGR/2 >=3B G3XKR. Apparently WSPR2 win= s the
>=3B 'coast-to-coast' competition on 475 kHz ... especially so = when one considers WSPR2 is a two minute
>=3B cycle time and OP's bes= t time is 4 minutes.
>=3B
>=3B And ... this was done with modera= te transmit power.
>=3B
>=3B Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/= 2
>=3B
>=3B
= --_8716ac33-8d80-4f93-80a2-0db74e4bff49_--