Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp547781igc; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:05:25 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr30393467wjd.11.1388073925162; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:05:25 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rz17si6703652wjb.88.2013.12.26.08.05.24 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 08:05:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VwCvk-0000Y8-FH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:33:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VwCvj-0000Xz-TA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:32:59 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s13.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.24]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VwCvh-0006mB-LO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 15:32:58 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W62 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s13.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Dec 2013 07:32:55 -0800 X-TMN: [HzmUYkoAFINrbye2xq8juDtceiPxrqJ4] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:32:54 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <52BC272F.7040803@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <2f507c1ff91346b2b8adba0518611224@kabelmail.de> <39966C71EF4543899F81399598C190F7@Extensa> <52BBFDC4.3010507@psk31.plus.com>,<52BC272F.7040803@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Dec 2013 15:32:55.0642 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF8D63A0:01CF024F] X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan; Even if you have your coils in weather proof housing rain is no good to transmit on 9 kHz? Bob Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 13:55:11 +0100 From: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Hi Uwe, Tom, VLF, [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.24 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 318d3d373f5ffaa82e0969bd1985b258 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_c0071bbc-5b5d-4cdc-a60a-a09ab89ccba5_" Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1770 --_c0071bbc-5b5d-4cdc-a60a-a09ab89ccba5_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan=3B Even if you have your coils in weather proof housing rain is no good to tra= nsmit on 9 kHz? Bob =20 Date: Thu=2C 26 Dec 2013 13:55:11 +0100 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hi Uwe=2C Tom=2C VLF=2C =0A= =0A= Best signal ever from Tom=2C capture attached. Is it due to the=0A= propagation or did it improve your signal? =0A= What about some tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there is=0A= permanent rain here so i have to wait some days longer. =0A= =0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC =0A= =0A= Am 26.12.2013 10:58=2C schrieb g3zjo:=0A= =0A= =0A= Hi All =0A= =20 =0A= Yes=2C yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less catastrophic=0A= noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong=0A= than during other tests I was in the catchment area. The low=0A= signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and=0A= 47uHz FFT but I was able to catch some nice periods when the=0A= signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I can categorically=0A= =0A= confirm reception. =0A= =20 =0A= Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8CAT) for the signal. =0A= =20 =0A= 73 Eddie G3ZJO =0A= http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm =0A= = --_c0071bbc-5b5d-4cdc-a60a-a09ab89ccba5_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan=3B
Even if you have yo= ur coils in weather proof housing rain is no good to transmit on 9 kHz? Bob=
 =3B

Date: Thu=2C 26 Dec 2013 13:55= :11 +0100
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_gro= up@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hi Uwe=2C Tom=2C VLF=2C
=0A=
=0A= Best signal ever from Tom=2C capture attached. Is it due to the=0A= propagation or did it improve your signal?
=0A= What about some tests in OPDS32 or maybe JT9-30? Unfortunately there is=0A= permanent rain here so i have to wait some days longer.
=0A=
=0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
=0A=
=0A= Am 26.12.2013 10:58=2C schrieb g3zjo:=0A=
=0A= =0A= Hi All
=0A=
=0A= Yes=2C yesterday was quieter on 8.9KHz with less catastrophic=0A= noise pulses. This meant that although Uwe's signal was less strong=0A= than during other tests I was in the catchment area. The low=0A= signal level means there are breaks in the line here in both 424uH and=0A= 47uHz FFT but I was able to catch some nice periods when the=0A= signal in 47uHz was10dB above the noise peaks. I can categorically= =0A= =0A= confirm reception.
=0A=
=0A= Thanks Uwe and (Tom DL8CAT) for the signal.
=0A=
=0A= 73 Eddie G3ZJO
=0A= http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabb= er.htm
=0A=
= --_c0071bbc-5b5d-4cdc-a60a-a09ab89ccba5_--