Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp146355igc; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.36.231 with SMTP id t7mr9154194wij.40.1387570109344; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id wj1si3618436wjb.46.2013.12.20.12.08.28 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu5Jn-0000dC-U5 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:01:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu5Jn-0000d1-6Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:01:03 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s9.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.20]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu5Jk-0000Wy-N1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:01:02 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W34 ([65.55.116.9]) by blu0-omc1-s9.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 11:00:59 -0800 X-TMN: [r4yDPWbRyIIYhralToU8emtdaTV0RSsO] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:00:58 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <52B48C4C.50901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <005d01cefd22$36f84a00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>, ,<52B48C4C.50901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2013 19:00:59.0481 (UTC) FILETIME=[D2058C90:01CEFDB5] X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan; As I said-band is fuller now than used to be! I used to run a KW about 45 W ERP 100% time with WSPR2. It would make occasional SV8 decodes along with almost all western Europeans. But since last year have been told to cut back to 30% time on and still I heard murmurs like "he already worked everybody 50 times over he needs more"?!!! I would tell Jay and Jay told me keep operating but run 25-30% time on-that that was fair. It's OK-I can understand that and yes am sure is same with you. You operate 50% on WSPR and it is fortunate that the 50% falls always on same quarter hour. Otherwise there is many nights no one else on to give sigs for T/A. I have to say, probably like you, worked most everything on 500 band and if go there run at reduced time on or more to QRP. We have plenty else going on [new LF-VLF-etc] so works out for everybody just fine-Bob [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f1284eec928b6c66f973fc41cf683e42 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_eafdc59a-05b5-4dd5-b885-9f16a3f0d19c_" Subject: RE: LF: OPERA overload? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1566 --_eafdc59a-05b5-4dd5-b885-9f16a3f0d19c_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan=3B As I said-band is fuller now than used to be! I used to run a KW about 45 = W ERP 100% time with WSPR2. It would make occasional SV8 decodes along wit= h almost all western Europeans. But since last year have been told to cut = back to 30% time on and still I heard murmurs like "he already worked every= body 50 times over he needs more"?!!! I would tell Jay and Jay told me ke= ep operating but run 25-30% time on-that that was fair. =20 It's OK-I can understand that and yes am sure is same with you. You operat= e 50% on WSPR and it is fortunate that the 50% falls always on same quarter= hour. Otherwise there is many nights no one else on to give sigs for T/A. I have to say=2C probably like you=2C worked most everything on 500 band an= d if go there run at reduced time on or more to QRP. We have plenty else g= oing on [new LF-VLF-etc] so works out for everybody just fine-Bob =20 Date: Fri=2C 20 Dec 2013 19:28:28 +0100 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: OPERA overload? =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hello Bob=2C=20 =0A= =0A= Am 20.12.2013 18:54=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A= =0A= =0A= G et all=3B =0A= Things have changed over this pasted year or so. Many more new=0A= stations have come on and these newbies are running lower power and=0A= RXers that may not be up to what some of the veteran ops are using. =0A= There really isn't allot of room for QRO in the 630 meter band=0A= =0A= =0A= Do you get complaints? What is the argumentation? What do they say?=0A= Same as here? 10000s of crashed air planes due to NDB interference?=0A= Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW? =0A= One day the A-Team will come and shoot down the antenna and PA=2C=0A= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D_MVonyVSQoM =3B-) =0A= Or is it maybe just envy=2C sometimes? =0A= I assume Jay doesn't see a problem when you go QRO sometimes=2C like=0A= Markus doesn't when i do. And i do not when Markus does or DK6SX/p on=0A= MF or DK2DB. It's just all fine :-) =0A= =0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC =0A= =0A= = --_eafdc59a-05b5-4dd5-b885-9f16a3f0d19c_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan=3B
As I said-band is f= uller now than used to be! =3B I used to run a KW about 45 W ERP 100% t= ime with WSPR2. =3B It would make occasional SV8 decodes along with alm= ost all western Europeans. =3B But since last year have been told to cu= t back to 30% time on and still I heard murmurs =3Blike "he already wor= ked everybody 50 times over =3B he needs more"?!!! =3B I would tell= Jay and Jay told me keep operating but run 25-30% time on-that that was fa= ir. =3B
It's OK-I can understand that and yes am sure is same with = you. =3B You operate 50% on WSPR and it is fortunate that the 50% falls= always on same quarter hour. =3B Otherwise there is many nights no one= else on =3Bto =3Bgive sigs for T/A.
I have to say=2C probably l= ike you=2C worked most everything on 500 band and if go there run =3Bat= reduced time on or more to QRP. =3B We have plenty else going on [new = LF-VLF-etc] so works out for everybody just fine-Bob
 =3B
Date: Fri=2C 20 Dec 2013 19:28:28 +0100
From: Stef= an.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Su= bject: Re: LF: OPERA overload?

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hello Bob=2C
=0A=
=0A= Am 20.12.2013 18:54=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A=
=0A= =0A=
G et all=3B
=0A= Things have changed over this pasted year or so. =3B Many more new=0A= stations have come on and =3Bthese newbies are running lower power and= =0A= RXers that may not be up to what some of the veteran ops are using. =3B= =0A= There really isn't allot of room for QRO in the 630 meter band
=0A=
=0A=
=0A= Do you get complaints? What is the argumentation? What do they say?=0A= Same as here? 10000s of crashed air planes due to NDB interference?=0A= Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW?
= =0A= One day the A-Team will come and shoot down the antenna and PA=2C=0A= http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D_MVonyV= SQoM =3B-)
=0A= Or is it maybe just envy=2C sometimes?
=0A= I assume Jay doesn't see a problem when you go QRO sometimes=2C like=0A= Markus doesn't when i do. And i do not when Markus does or DK6SX/p on=0A= MF or DK2DB. It's just all fine :-)
=0A=
=0A= 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC
=0A=
=0A=
= --_eafdc59a-05b5-4dd5-b885-9f16a3f0d19c_--