Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp148257igc; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:38:29 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.73.173 with SMTP id m13mr1267913wiv.28.1387571907234; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:38:27 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c9si3650750wjy.47.2013.12.20.12.38.26 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:38:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu6JN-0001Qc-L3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:04:41 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu6JK-0001QK-UK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:04:38 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s16.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.27]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu6JI-0000xf-GR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:04:37 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W22 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s16.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:04:35 -0800 X-TMN: [5tlguD6k1riLnxqURiOQBLD35Y7GOEEA] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:04:35 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <52B49FF1.8030107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <005d01cefd22$36f84a00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>, ,<52B48C4C.50901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<52B49FF1.8030107@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2013 20:04:35.0520 (UTC) FILETIME=[B48EE400:01CEFDBE] X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:52:17 +0100 From: Re: LF: OPERA overload? Hi Bob, Am 20.12.2013 20:00, schrieb Bob Raide: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.27 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 2015a9c9c70c0326c96b00c8a41f50f5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_23e3451c-607b-4fb4-97d1-e3fd710f9ef5_" Subject: RE: LF: OPERA overload? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1568 --_23e3451c-607b-4fb4-97d1-e3fd710f9ef5_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 Date: Fri=2C 20 Dec 2013 20:52:17 +0100 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: OPERA overload? =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hi Bob=2C=20 =0A= =0A= Am 20.12.2013 20:00=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A= =0A= =0A= Stefan=3B =0A= As I said-band is fuller now than used to be! I used to run a KW about=0A= 45 W ERP 100% time with WSPR2. It would make occasional SV8 decodes=0A= along with almost all western Europeans. But since last year have been=0A= told to cut back to 30% time on and still I heard murmurs like "he=0A= already worked everybody 50 times over he needs more"?!!! I would=0A= tell Jay and Jay told me keep operating but run 25-30% time on-that=0A= that was fair. =20 =0A= =0A= =0A= Yes=2C that OK i think. 100% is a bit hard :-) I did TX 100% with my=0A= indoor loop and 100 uW ERP but that is a different thing :-) =0A= =0A= =0A= It's OK-I can understand that and yes am sure is same=0A= with you. You operate 50% on WSPR and it is fortunate that the 50%=0A= falls always on same quarter hour. Otherwise there is many nights no=0A= one else on to give sigs for T/A. =0A= I have to say=2C probably like you=2C worked most everything on 500 band=0A= and if go there run at reduced time on or more to QRP. We have plenty=0A= else going on [new LF-VLF-etc] so works out for everybody just fine-Bob =0A= =0A= =0A= RR. =0A= But even if you "worked" everybody 50 times=2C there will be a newcomer=2C= =0A= somewhere=2C maybe with a poor RX antenna in the first stage and then=0A= this newcomer will be most grateful for your signal and he will be=0A= motivated to build a better RX antenna so that he can even receive the=0A= weaker stations. That's the thing!=20 =0A= There are enough OMs who will listen on 630m with a short HF antenna=0A= for the first time. If there were no signals=2C they would say the band=0A= is dead=2C maybe.=20 =0A= And there are several LF amateurs who do the effort to maximise their=0A= RX performance just to receive signals like yours=2C over several 1000km. Yes=2C Stefan there can and usually is new stations popping up that are lo= oking for T/A decode. If you are QRP you may miss him as he starting out c= ould just be using 40 or 80 m dipole to RX-no decode for QRP signal. So we= should occasionally get on 472 band and run reduced time to get and keep = these newbies coming back. I look many nights on 630M and couple dozen T/A= receivers and nobody this side poking enough signal through for them to de= code!Reduce time under 40 % but keep that "Fire to the wire" OM-73=2C Bob = =20 =0A= 73=2C Stefan =0A= =0A= =0A= = --_23e3451c-607b-4fb4-97d1-e3fd710f9ef5_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 =3B

Date: Fri=2C 20 Dec 2013 20:52:17 +0100
From: Stefan.Schaef= er@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re= : LF: OPERA overload?

=0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= =0A= Hi Bob=2C
=0A=
=0A= Am 20.12.2013 20:00=2C schrieb Bob Raide:=0A=
=0A= =0A=
Stefan=3B
=0A= As I said-band is fuller now than used to be! =3B I used to run a KW ab= out=0A= 45 W ERP 100% time with WSPR2. =3B It would make occasional SV8 decodes= =0A= along with almost all western Europeans. =3B But since last year have b= een=0A= told to cut back to 30% time on and still I heard murmurs =3Blike "he= =0A= already worked everybody 50 times over =3B he needs more"?!!! =3B I= would=0A= tell Jay and Jay told me keep operating but run 25-30% time on-that=0A= that was fair. =3B
=0A=
=0A=
=0A= Yes=2C that OK i think. 100% is a bit hard :-) I did TX 100% with my=0A= indoor loop and 100 uW ERP but that is a different thing :-)
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
It's OK-I can understand that and yes am sure is same=0A= with you. =3B You operate 50% on WSPR and it is fortunate that the 50%= =0A= falls always on same quarter hour. =3B Otherwise there is many nights n= o=0A= one else on =3Bto =3Bgive sigs for T/A.
=0A= I have to say=2C probably like you=2C worked most everything on 500 band=0A= and if go there run =3Bat reduced time on or more to QRP. =3B We ha= ve plenty=0A= else going on [new LF-VLF-etc] so works out for everybody just fine-Bob
= =0A=
=0A=
=0A= RR.
=0A= But even if you "worked" everybody 50 times=2C there will be a newcomer=2C= =0A= somewhere=2C maybe with a poor RX antenna in the first stage and then=0A= this newcomer will be most grateful for your signal and he will be=0A= motivated to build a better RX antenna so that he can even receive the=0A= weaker stations. That's the thing!
=0A= There are enough OMs who will listen on 630m with a short HF antenna=0A= for the first time. If there were no signals=2C they would say the band=0A= is dead=2C maybe.
=0A= And there are several LF amateurs who do the effort to maximise their=0A= RX performance just to receive signals like yours=2C over several 1000km.
 =3B
Yes=2C Stefan there can and usually is new = stations popping up that are looking for T/A decode. =3B If you are QRP= you may miss him as he starting out could just be using 40 or 80 m dipole = to RX-no decode for QRP signal. =3B So we should occasionally get on 47= 2 band and run reduced time =3B to get and keep these newbies coming ba= ck. =3B I look many nights on 630M and couple dozen T/A receivers and n= obody this side poking enough signal through for them to decode!
= Reduce time under 40 =3B% but keep that "Fire to the wire" OM-73=2C Bob=  =3B
=0A= 73=2C Stefan
=0A=
= =0A=
=0A=
= --_23e3451c-607b-4fb4-97d1-e3fd710f9ef5_--