Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp458512igb; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:01:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.181.11.169 with SMTP id ej9mr460425wid.13.1386892900586; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:01:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b2si44016wja.1.2013.12.12.16.01.40 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VrFng-0003ND-6Z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:36:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VrFnf-0003N4-MO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:36:11 +0000 Received: from blu0-omc1-s33.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.44]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VrFnd-0004xA-9V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:36:10 +0000 Received: from BLU180-W18 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s33.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:36:08 -0800 X-TMN: [lW/RiKQsYueMcX+j2XTc3cbsuNjPcwNw] X-Originating-Email: [rjraide@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Bob Raide To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:07 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <004c01cef792$3fa88e20$bef9aa60$@com> References: , <5C6D6BC04A584E798275EA32CAB71912@White>,<52AA38EB.6060305@gmx.de> ,<004c01cef792$3fa88e20$bef9aa60$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Dec 2013 23:36:08.0643 (UTC) FILETIME=[EEF1C130:01CEF792] X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Terry. You can manually upload it if you want to but am sure you will get plenty of decodes-Bob From: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 23:31:13 +0000 Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection? [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rjraide[at]hotmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 29f208b223fe7a2cb359508e38e2ea2d Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_3849fe88-43bd-4e0b-a796-62a97ac73ee5_" Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection? X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,HTML_50_60, HTML_MESSAGE,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1721 --_3849fe88-43bd-4e0b-a796-62a97ac73ee5_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Terry. You can manually upload it if you want to but am sure you wi= ll get plenty of decodes-Bob =20 From: GW0EZY@Sky.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Thu=2C 12 Dec 2013 23:31:13 +0000 Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 1= 5... "Band" selection? Bob First decode from you at 2300 =96 forgot to check =93Upload Spots=94 = =96 hopefully will start reporting more decodes soon. 2300 -37 0.1 0.= 074613 0 WG4XRS FN12 30 73 Terry From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@= blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob= Raide Sent: 12 December 2013 22:35 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 1= 5... "Band" selection? I moved to 13.5 as looks cleanest on Victors dropbox= grabber. > Date: Thu=2C 12 Dec 2013 23:30:03 +0100 > From: h-wolff@gmx.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR= 15... "Band" selection? >=20 > Am 2013-12-12 22:48=2C schrieb Markus Vester: > > Unfortunately 74613 Hz looks a bit noisier here than 614: http://dl.dro= pboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz.jpg >=20 > Markus=2C > I have here not the strong DCF77 noise: > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/2013-12-12-2215_74600kHz.jpg >=20 > 74613=2C5 Hz is looking good in your screenshot. Just above 74614 Hz is a= =20 > weak Loran line > --=20 > 73 > Hartmut >=20 > = --_3849fe88-43bd-4e0b-a796-62a97ac73ee5_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Terry. =3B You can ma= nually upload it if you want to but am sure you will get plenty of decodes-= Bob
 =3B
From: GW0EZY@Sky.com
To:= rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Date: Thu=2C 12 Dec 2013 23:31:13 +0000Subject: RE: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR = 15... "Band" selection?

Bob

 =3B

First decode from you at 2300 =96 forgot to check=  =3B=93Upload Spots=94 =96 hopefully will start reporting more decodes= soon.

=  =3B

2300 =3B -37 =3B =3B 0.1 =3B =3B =3B 0.074613&= nbsp=3B =3B =3B 0 =3B =3B WG4XRS =3B =3B =3B&nb= sp=3B =3B =3B =3B FN12 =3B =3B =3B =3B 30

 =3B

73 Terry=

 = =3B

From= : owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group= @blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Bob Raide
Sent: 12 December = 2013 22:35
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: RE= : LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for short] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band"= selection?

 =3B

I moved to 13.5 as looks cleanest on =3BVictors dropbox grabb= er.
 =3B

>=3B Date: Thu=2C 12 Dec 2013 23:3= 0:03 +0100
>=3B From: h-wolff@gmx.de=
>=3B To: rsgb_lf_= group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Subject: Re: LF: WG2XRS/4 [WG4XRS for sh= ort] will start at 2200 with WSPR 15... "Band" selection?
>=3B
>= =3B Am 2013-12-12 22:48=2C schrieb Markus Vester:
>=3B >=3B Unfortun= ately 74613 Hz looks a bit noisier here than 614: http://dl.= dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/df6nm_74kHz.jpg
>=3B
>=3B = Markus=2C
>=3B I have here not the strong DCF77 noise:
>=3B https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/2013-1= 2-12-2215_74600kHz.jpg
>=3B
>=3B 74613=2C5 Hz is looking goo= d in your screenshot. Just above 74614 Hz is a
>=3B weak Loran line>=3B --
>=3B 73
>=3B Hartmut
>=3B
>=3B

= --_3849fe88-43bd-4e0b-a796-62a97ac73ee5_--