Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp247985igc; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:37:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.21.244 with SMTP id y20mr14812364wie.37.1387705040971; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:37:20 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hm6si5494883wjb.5.2013.12.22.01.37.20 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 01:37:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vuf1a-0000gp-5E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:08:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vuf1Z-0000gg-9S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:08:37 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.4]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vuf1W-0000Gz-Vl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:08:36 +0000 Received: from cpsps-ews21.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.187]) by cpsmtpb-ews01.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:08:32 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.7]) by cpsps-ews21.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:08:32 +0100 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:08:32 +0100 Message-ID: <685D4D8C8C9C482180A80091B13680F0@Extensa> From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: <52B190D4.7070307@psk31.plus.com> <52B1C52E.3050707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <012901cefea4$63f31610$2bd94230$@comcast.net> <52B62A0D.3030409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <52B62A0D.3030409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 09:08:32 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2013 09:08:32.0738 (UTC) FILETIME=[63568420:01CEFEF5] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Jim, Or check VLF grabber www.qsl.net/pa1sdb Did you know that it is easy to start and run several Spectrum Lab sessions at one PC ? Just hit the SL start icon again and reconfigure it. I have here a "Retro" 1000 MHz PC who has 4 SL running for 4x. The 4 are published at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb grabber. I commit, that PC does nothing els besides VLF RX. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) X-Scan-Signature: 49f0f587e44d6711c57b8a4e950ba850 Subject: Re: LF: 8.9KHz Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2101 Hello Jim, Or check VLF grabber www.qsl.net/pa1sdb Did you know that it is easy to start and run several Spectrum Lab sessions at one PC ? Just hit the SL start icon again and reconfigure it. I have here a "Retro" 1000 MHz PC who has 4 SL running for 4x. The 4 are published at www.qsl.net/pa1sdb grabber. I commit, that PC does nothing els besides VLF RX. So why not run a Wideband, 424, 238 and 47 uHz for example :-) 73's, Peter - PA1SDB Am 22.12.2013 00:28, schrieb hvanesce: > I anyone planning 8.9kHz tests in the near future? I'll have SpecLab running > in the VLF from now on except for upgrades. What is the best frequency range > to monitor? I have been planning to use 47uHz bandwidth. > > 73, Jim AA5BW > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Schäfer > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:54 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: 8.9KHz > > Hi Eddie, > > Yes, maybe this weekend, if the WX permits. I just made some optimisations > to the PA und will do more changes to the system. > I will announce it one day in advance or so. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 18.12.2013 13:11, schrieb g3zjo: > >> Hi All >> >> Are there any more 8.9KHz tests planned for the near future. I missed >> Stefan's last. >> >> I look forward to any that come up, plenty of warning appreciated please. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> > >