Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp750002igc; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 11:24:12 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.205.162 with SMTP id lh2mr40800593wic.57.1388345050764; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 11:24:10 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j5si16742432wiy.49.2013.12.29.11.24.10 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 11:24:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VxL9o-0007sq-HD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:32:12 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VxL9o-0007sh-2N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:32:12 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VxL9m-0003aR-Ai for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:32:10 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBTIW9gE026919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:32:09 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBTIW9OZ031479 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:32:09 +0100 Message-ID: <52C06A9C.5050806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 19:31:56 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20C550A7D07741688C6A26E73CBCF741@White> <52BF4895.8080502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52BF7E2A.9000002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52BFD963.8020300@freenet.de> <8C09023FA2074CB380BC9CF1E7A514E3@White> <52C00514.4030805@freenet.de> <52C04A0A.5070101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <52C05731.3060401@freenet.de>,<52C0630C.8090407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 29.12.2013 19:24, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > Is this amp shown capable of handling 300 + volts like your 137 amp > that I believe is similar in design? Bob > Hi Bob, Yes it is. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 318d3d373f5ffaa82e0969bd1985b258 Subject: Re: LF: MF PA Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050901040608090106000304" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2428 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050901040608090106000304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 29.12.2013 19:24, schrieb Bob Raide: > Stefan; > Is this amp shown capable of handling 300 + volts like your 137 amp > that I believe is similar in design? Bob > Hi Bob, Yes it is. 73, Stefan > > Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:59:40 +0100 > > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Subject: LF: MF PA > > > > Hi Wolf, > > > > What type of FETs are you using? The standard IRFPs? Many of them have > > internal Z diodes, so no addional RC network or Z idode is needed. The > > losses are there anyway, of course. > > > > In some older projects i also played with that critical working point, > > i.e. where one FET shuts down and the other opens. I've tried simple RC > > networks (series R, parallel C) with an 100 Ohm trimmer. That worked > > reasonably but usually it is not even necessary. My small MF PA is > using > > a simple ICL7667 and 2x IRFZ48N (Reichelt...) without problems. > > My large PA generates up to 1.2 kW, which is also enough to reach 1 W > > ERP, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/mod%20MF%20PA.jpg. > > It was designed for field experiments (Field day) where MUCH more > > inefficient antennas will be tested, e.g. in France, next year, if they > > have the allocation then... > > > > 73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC --------------050901040608090106000304 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Am 29.12.2013 19:24, schrieb Bob Raide:
Stefan;
Is this amp shown capable of handling 300 + volts like your 137 amp that I believe is similar in design? Bob
 

Hi Bob,

Yes it is.

73, Stefan

> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 18:59:40 +0100
> From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: MF PA
>
> Hi Wolf,
>
> What type of FETs are you using? The standard IRFPs? Many of them have
> internal Z diodes, so no addional RC network or Z idode is needed. The
> losses are there anyway, of course.
>
> In some older projects i also played with that critical working point,
> i.e. where one FET shuts down and the other opens. I've tried simple RC
> networks (series R, parallel C) with an 100 Ohm trimmer. That worked
> reasonably but usually it is not even necessary. My small MF PA is using
> a simple ICL7667 and 2x IRFZ48N (Reichelt...) without problems.
> My large PA generates up to 1.2 kW, which is also enough to reach 1 W
> ERP, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/MF/mod%20MF%20PA.jpg.
> It was designed for field experiments (Field day) where MUCH more
> inefficient antennas will be tested, e.g. in France, next year, if they
> have the allocation then...
>
> 73, GL, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------050901040608090106000304--