Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp742408igc; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 08:26:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.8.34 with SMTP id o2mr25775905wja.22.1388334374070; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 08:26:14 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bj10si15818879wjc.39.2013.12.29.08.26.13 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 08:26:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VxInq-0005Rk-8z for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:01:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VxInp-0005Rb-OU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:01:21 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VxInn-0002n2-UB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 16:01:20 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id rBTG1IjJ019150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:01:19 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBTG1IcY026695 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:01:18 +0100 Message-ID: <52C04741.5050800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 17:01:05 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <52BF6E86.10300@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe, LF, Signals were not so strong (S/N) here. This is the best image from last night: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/TA60_29.DEC_07.40UTC.jpg BUT: I've prepared some high Q pot cores to improve my LF RX, see https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/LF%20RX%20pot%20cores.jpg Q is above 500. That will help a bit. Another step is in preparation, a series configuration of band filters for LF and MF in front of the first FET. That could help even more, also on MF (due to AFN and DLF). [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f45514038df04b1035abb1d5446da941 Subject: Re: LF: Strong TA-Signals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050006030001070107020303" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2991 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050006030001070107020303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rBTG1IjJ019150 Hi Joe, LF, Signals were not so strong (S/N) here. This is the best image from last=20 night:=20 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/TA60_29.DEC_07.40UTC.jpg BUT: I've prepared some high Q pot cores to improve my LF RX, see=20 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/LF%20RX%20pot%20cores.jpg Q is above 500. That will help a bit. Another step is in preparation, a=20 series configuration of band filters for LF and MF in front of the first=20 FET. That could help even more, also on MF (due to AFN and DLF). 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 29.12.2013 13:18, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hartmut, most impressive, as usual! > Here I got a fat signal from VO1NA again, and at least partly readable=20 > traces from WD2XGJ and WE2XEB (see "screenshots last 24 h" link at the=20 > bottom of my grabber). > In the =B5Hz spectrogram, there is are also weak blue trace on 137777.5= 8=20 > Hz probably caused by WD2XKO, and some activity near 137779.0 likely=20 > from WD2XES's DFCW. > Thanks all for transmitting, it's a pleasure to be treated with such=20 > a bounty of signals! > 73, Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* Hartmut Wolff > *Sent:* Sunday, December 29, 2013 1:36 AM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* LF: Strong TA-Signals > > Grabber: > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/136kHz-Grabber.jpg > > --=20 > 73 > Hartmut > > --------------050006030001070107020303 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id rBTG1IjJ019150 Hi Joe, LF,

Signals were not so strong=A0 (S/N) here. This is the best image from last night: https://dl.dropboxusercontent= .com/u/19882028/LF/TA60_29.DEC_07.40UTC.jpg

BUT: I've prepared some high Q pot cores to improve my LF RX, see https://dl.dropboxuserconten= t.com/u/19882028/LF/LF%20RX%20pot%20cores.jpg
Q is above 500. That will help a bit. Another step is in preparation, a series configuration of band filters for LF and MF in front of the first FET. That could help even more, also on MF (due to AFN and DLF).
73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 29.12.2013 13:18, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hartmut, most impressive, as usual= !
=A0
Here I got a fat signal from VO1NA again, and at least partly readable traces from=A0WD2XGJ and WE2XEB (see "screenshots last 24 h" link at the bottom of my grabber).
=A0
In the =B5Hz spectrogram, there=A0= is are also weak blue trace on 137777.58 Hz=A0probably caused by WD2XKO, and some activity near 137779.0=A0likely from WD2XES's DFCW.
=A0
Thanks all for transmitting, it's = a pleasure to=A0be treated with=A0such a=A0bounty=A0of signals!
=A0
73, Markus (DF6NM)

Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 1:36 AM
Subject: LF: Strong TA-Signals

Grabber:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/50178231/136kHz-Grabber.jpg

--
73
Hartmut


--------------050006030001070107020303--