Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp482012igc; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 08:24:28 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.14.10 with SMTP id l10mr26230088wic.6.1387988662588; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 08:24:22 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bf6si8793872wjc.14.2013.12.25.08.24.22 for ; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 08:24:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VvqNt-0004vo-Nv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:28:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VvqNt-0004vf-3r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:28:33 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VvqNo-00028E-U3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:28:31 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoBAFP5ulJcGS2K/2dsb2JhbAANS4JHfIkxnhSSd4EugxkBAQEBAgFVEhcLCwcCCAQBAQEJFggHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQGHbAMJFa8PkxIIEoZFF40KGYEYEQFWAYQ2BIFTlkSBMIstiGSBaAkb X-IPAS-Result: ApoBAFP5ulJcGS2K/2dsb2JhbAANS4JHfIkxnhSSd4EugxkBAQEBAgFVEhcLCwcCCAQBAQEJFggHCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQGHbAMJFa8PkxIIEoZFF40KGYEYEQFWAYQ2BIFTlkSBMIstiGSBaAkb X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,549,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217";a="431326052" Received: from host-92-25-45-138.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.45.138]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 25 Dec 2013 15:28:27 +0000 Message-ID: <52BAF999.4000606@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 15:28:25 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005a01cf002d$00126e90$00374bb0$@comcast.net> <7D1D9D5B19734F49A4322B1DB466E813@White> In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131225-0, 25/12/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Marcus Yes just visible. The storms have left us here, temporarily they say. 73 Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [62.24.128.240 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image X-Scan-Signature: f6b061074980f2df097866ecbfb83465 Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030204080900020402000806" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3504 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030204080900020402000806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Marcus Yes just visible. The storms have left us here, temporarily they say. 73 Eddie On 25/12/2013 13:57, Markus Vester wrote: > Cat alarm! > Today noise and QRM is very low here, and now there's a clear trace on > my grabber > http://df6nm.darc.de/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm > ... about 13 dB SNR in 0.47 mHz, and even faintly visible in "600" 3.8 > mHz. Better than ever! > May well show up on Eddie's grabber again > http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23312120/vlfgrabber.html > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* Markus Vester > *Sent:* Monday, December 23, 2013 11:44 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: VLF: 8969.99 > > Hi Jim, > didn't see the cat myself, he was betrayed to me by others > Lubos http://www.ok2bvg.cz/vlfgrabber/ > Paul http://abelian.org/vlf/fbins.shtml#p=1387832400&b=080&s=sp > > Peter http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/ > Stefan > http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber.html > Apparently Uwe's cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, but > not this morning. Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to > catch much of it, except for the odd bright pixel. > 73 and good luck, > Markus (DF6NM) > > *From:* hvanesce > *Sent:* Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* RE: VLF: 8969.99 > > Uwe and Markus, > > Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I'm trying to interpret using > Markus' grabber. > > Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, > continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making > receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) > approximately 01:00 -- 10:00. If I had known that it wasn't raining at > 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications. > > I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks everyone > for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of detection > with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) periods. > > 73, Jim AA5BW > > *From:*owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] *On Behalf Of > *uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de > *Sent:* Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: VLF: 8969.99 > > Yes, Markus, but he is back agn. > GL, Uwe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: VLF: 8969.99 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hey Uwe, your cat's on walkabout again! 73, Markus > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > > --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com --------------030204080900020402000806 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Marcus

Yes just visible. The storms have left us here, temporarily they say.

73 Eddie
 
On 25/12/2013 13:57, Markus Vester wrote:
Cat alarm!
 
Today noise and QRM is very low here, and now there's a clear trace on my grabber
... about 13 dB SNR in 0.47 mHz, and even faintly visible in "600" 3.8 mHz. Better than ever!
 
May well show up on Eddie's grabber again
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 

Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

Hi Jim,
 
didn't see the cat myself, he was betrayed to me by others
 
 
Apparently Uwe's cat's carrier was on air today from 17 to 21 UT, but not this morning. Unfortunately my own grabber is too noisy to catch much of it, except for the odd bright pixel.
 
73 and good luck,
Markus (DF6NM)
 

From: hvanesce
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 11:18 PM
Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99

Uwe and Markus,

 

Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I’m trying to interpret using Markus’ grabber.

 

Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) approximately 01:00 – 10:00. If I had known that it wasn’t raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications.

 

I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) periods.

 

73, Jim AA5BW

 

 

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99

 

Yes, Markus, but he is back agn.
GL, Uwe

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: VLF: 8969.99

 

Hey Uwe, your cat's on walkabout again!  73, Markus

 



This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.





This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.


--------------030204080900020402000806--