Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp146359igc; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:35 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.90.230 with SMTP id bz6mr5194465wib.17.1387570110272; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x6si3592170wju.162.2013.12.20.12.08.29 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu6Gl-0001MK-Jk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:01:59 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu6Gl-0001MB-3g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:01:59 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu6Gj-0000w7-BQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 20:01:58 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBKK1uK2031106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:01:56 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBKK1uvX008864 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:01:56 +0100 Message-ID: <52B4A22F.8090509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 21:01:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005d01cefd22$36f84a00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>, <52B48C4C.50901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <009001cefdb9$49aa7cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> In-Reply-To: <009001cefdb9$49aa7cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay, Yes yes, i know. Question is what ++ means :-) But it wasn't a complaint to you, Jay. We have DCF 39 here, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/DCF39%20in%20488%20mHz.png ... That is already 10 dB attenuated by the LF band filter. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: OPERA overload? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2540 Hi Jay, Yes yes, i know. Question is what ++ means :-) But it wasn't a complaint to you, Jay. We have DCF 39 here, https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/DCF39%20in%20488%20mHz.png ... That is already 10 dB attenuated by the LF band filter. 73, Stefan Am 20.12.2013 20:25, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: > Stefan > >> Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW? > > Try a measured 30+ + dB above the noise in 3.2 kHz BW ... that's the > way it is here. If you haven't experienced that get out a signal > generator, key it, and inject it into your receiver along with the > weak signals in OP or WSPR. Let me know how you make out. > > Jay