Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp146350igc; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.83.1 with SMTP id m1mr9080267wiy.9.1387570106879; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:26 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dt8si3824997wib.9.2013.12.20.12.08.26 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:08:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu4oO-0000NP-Gu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:28:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Vu4oO-0000NG-2u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:28:36 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Vu4oM-0000LA-83 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:28:34 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBKISXh9021332 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:28:33 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id rBKISXZ3005504 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:28:33 +0100 Message-ID: <52B48C4C.50901@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:28:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <005d01cefd22$36f84a00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>, In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Bob, Am 20.12.2013 18:54, schrieb Bob Raide: > G et all; > Things have changed over this pasted year or so. Many more new > stations have come on and these newbies are running lower power and > RXers that may not be up to what some of the veteran ops are using. > There really isn't allot of room for QRO in the 630 meter band [...] Content analysis details: (-2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: f1498eebf16822c5ea85527a90413169 Subject: Re: LF: OPERA overload? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060203040203060003060505" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2539 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060203040203060003060505 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Bob, Am 20.12.2013 18:54, schrieb Bob Raide: > G et all; > Things have changed over this pasted year or so. Many more new > stations have come on and these newbies are running lower power and > RXers that may not be up to what some of the veteran ops are using. > There really isn't allot of room for QRO in the 630 meter band Do you get complaints? What is the argumentation? What do they say? Same as here? 10000s of crashed air planes due to NDB interference? Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW? One day the A-Team will come and shoot down the antenna and PA, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MVonyVSQoM ;-) Or is it maybe just envy, sometimes? I assume Jay doesn't see a problem when you go QRO sometimes, like Markus doesn't when i do. And i do not when Markus does or DK6SX/p on MF or DK2DB. It's just all fine :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------060203040203060003060505 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Bob,

Am 20.12.2013 18:54, schrieb Bob Raide:
G et all;
Things have changed over this pasted year or so.  Many more new stations have come on and these newbies are running lower power and RXers that may not be up to what some of the veteran ops are using.  There really isn't allot of room for QRO in the 630 meter band

Do you get complaints? What is the argumentation? What do they say? Same as here? 10000s of crashed air planes due to NDB interference? Overloaded RX because your signal is 30 dB above the noise in 1 Hz NBW?
One day the A-Team will come and shoot down the antenna and PA, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MVonyVSQoM ;-)
Or is it maybe just envy, sometimes?
I assume Jay doesn't see a problem when you go QRO sometimes, like Markus doesn't when i do. And i do not when Markus does or DK6SX/p on MF or DK2DB. It's just all fine :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


--------------060203040203060003060505--